Drive Notes: 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E GT Rally

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

We're doing another edition of Drive Notes -- a capsule review of a car myself or a staffer drove that doesn't quite need a full review.

Today it's a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E GT Rally -- and yes, it is a 2024 but I drove it deep into 2025. Sometimes cars stick around for a while, and it's still worth a write-up for used-car shoppers. Not to mention that sometimes models carry over virtually unchanged.


Selecting the Rally -- which Ford lists separately on its Web site but which was marked GT with the Rally package listed as a $6,000 as an option on the Monroney of the car I had -- nets you specific exterior graphics, a different front splitter, a black roof, and a different front fascia that houses fog lamps. The upper and lower body moldings are unique to this trim.

The pair of electric motors pairs for 480 horsepower and 650 lb-ft of torque, and that of course means this one is also all-wheel drive. The extended-range battery promises a capacity of 91 kWh and a range of 265 miles.

The Rally is meant to give drivers off-road fun on gravel roads -- and I had no chance to test that during a short loan. Sorry, gang. But I got enough wheel time on city streets to write this capsule review.

The base price here is $53,995 and standard features include B&O audio, drainable frunk, LED lighting, power liftgate, rain-sensing wipers, dual-zone climate control, 360-camera, regenerative braking, Sync 4A infotainment, J1772 CCS combo connector, and a wireless charging pad.

Options included the Rally Package, which also adds Magneride adaptive damping and a unique spoiler, the Star White paint ($995), BlueCruise ($2,100), and a mobile power cord ($500). Out the door: $65,485, including $1,895 in destination and delivery.

On to the pros and cons.

Pros:

  • As befits most EVs, especially those with sporting missions, the Rally is fleet of foot off the line. I continue to enjoy the adjustable drive modes on the Mach-E.
  • I never had the chance to power-slide this thing through a dirt corner, but it handled well on in the urban and suburban environments in which I drive.
  • I don't know why I care this much about a steering wheel, but the one this car has is attractive.
  • The large infotainment screen is easy to read.
  • I still don't like how Ford slapped the Mustang name on this car -- not because it's an EV, but because it's a totally different platform -- but the Mach-E channels the idea of a Mustang. It's fun to drive, fast, sporty, and looks cool.
  • The Rally wheels are very, very nice-looking.
  • I had no chance to use BlueCruise during this test, but every time I use it on a Ford or Lincoln vehicle, it works well.

Cons

  • The ride is way too stiff. Speed bumps in cities are cause for pause -- taking one too fast will remind you what you had for lunch.
  • As ever with the Mach-E, the interior feels too small and cramped. Even when you're in the car alone.
  • The large infotainment screen is easy to read, sure, but you must menu-dive via touch to make even some basic, easy adjustments to things like the drive mode or climate controls. Or even for adjusting the desired level of regenerative braking.
  • While there's very little noise from the electric motors, a bit too much wind noise and outside noise seeps in.
  • The price is dear.
  • I am not sure who the buyer is. Sure, in theory, this thing will be fun on a dirt/gravel road. Sure, it looks cool. But the target market is niche.

From a driving dynamics perspective, the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT Rally edition is a delight, but unless you plan on using it as intended, there's no really reason to drop the six grand over the GT.

Otherwise, this car exhibits the same pluses and minuses as Mach-Es have since launch.

Which makes it a fun to drive four-door EV that's not quite an SUV. One that is good-looking but cramped, pricey, and overdoses on touch-screen commands.

[Images © 2025 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 43 comments
  • Lloyd Bonified Lloyd Bonified on Dec 15, 2025

    God forgive me, but I don't hate it

  • Txclyde1 Txclyde1 on May 15, 2026

    Democracy runs of the safest , cleanest ,cheapest energy in the world oil and NG ..

    followed by clean coal .aIf you don’t have that you don’t have a democracy comrade Skippy .Now go back and watch your May Day protests in mommies basement .You ever heard of loose lips sink ships ????The new phrase is EV’s sink ships ….cause they do .Nine of the largest ocean vehicle shipping companies will no longer allow EVs on board .Facts suck right comrade Skippy .Its ok Putin and Stalin are proud of you !!

  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
  • Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
Next