E85 Boondoggle of the Day: $5.5 Million DOE Grants for the SOS
Now that the Department of Energy (DOE) has doled out some $25 billion to help automakers retool taxpayers—I mean, retrofit factories to build incrementally more fuel efficient vehicles than the ones built at the same locations previously—the agency is continuing its cash for anything environmental program. Our old friend E85 is the beneficiary of a $5.5 million handout as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The money goes towards two noble goals sure to get the American economy on its feed—I mean feet. First up: “outreach.” Which is Fed-speak for pro-industry propaganda, presumably . . .
This topic area is aimed at increasing public awareness through national campaigns to inform the public on the benefits, safety and use requirements of higher ethanol blends up to E85. Projects that include materials as part of a dispenser display showing fuel energy content, mileage impact, costs per mile and greenhouse gas reductions are encouraged.
DOE has dedicated $2 million to this topic area and anticipates making five individual awards between $250,000 and $1 million per project. There is no cost-sharing requirements for this topic area.
Good luck spinning that lot. Second, “infrastructure.”
This topic area will fund projects that expand the infrastructure at retail fuel locations to accommodate ethanol blends up to E85. Individual projects may include modifications, upgrades or expansion of existing infrastructure at retail gas stations or the creation of new infrastructure to accommodate higher ethanol blends. Relevant infrastructure includes dispensing equipment, storage tanks and systems for tracking the amount of ethanol dispensed.
DOE has dedicated $3.5 million to this topic area and hopes to fund up to 30 individual projects with awards of $50,000 to $200,000 per project. Applicants must provide 50% cost share.
This type of subsidy isn’t doing squat for the E85 industry. Bottom line: even with a 50 percent reduction in the cost of installing the corn juice pumps, not enough people want the fuel to recoup the cash. What does that tell you?
More by Robert Farago
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Forward Observer Tesla cash on hand is $45 billion. That is a large mattress.Ford Motor Company market cap is $46 billion. Wait, forget I said that.
- Pianoboy57 I would never buy this even if i had the money. What makes it so special? Limited Edition? That doesn't mean anything at the BHPH lot.
- 6.2deadlifters Because of the current administration no cheap car can exist. US worker SalariesUS sourced materials with costs from US salaries aquiring materials.US UnionsUS corporationsTARIFFS against trade partnersAll these things prevent a 'good' 'reliable' 20,000$ 4-door 4-passanger car capable of 4-start offset and side impact crash protection.Game-Set-Match, end of line. No possible outcome. No discussion possible. every american loses.
- Forward Observer The last time I had a door off my truck I hung it from my Little Giant ladder. But I was only replacing the hinge pins.I'm sorry if this sounds smarmy or smug, I am working on my people skills. (My therapist says I have a long way to go to catch up with some of you.) Would smarmy and smug come in handy if I worked for an automotive dealership? (I wonder.)
- Arthur Dailey Auto 'journalists' should stop referencing the average new car purchase price and instead report on the mean price. We all understand that the glue of luxury vehicles and full size pickups inflate the average price.For me, 'affordable' hovers around the $35k mark.Under current N.A. standards, hatchbacks, stations wagons and non-luxury coupes are basically a lost cause.Personally I would like to see Canada convert to accepting vehicles that have passed the European standards, rather than adhering only to N.A. standards. That would allow for the importation of vehicles such as Dacias, Skodas, and yes more Fiats. Also some models for Japanese and Korean manufacturers that currently are not sold in North America. It may even help Mitsubishi in the Canadian market and allow for the return of Suzuki. Having more small, affordable vehicles available is not a bad thing.
Comments
Join the conversation
In the Land of Trillion$ a paltry $5.5 million isn't noticed.
Chevrolet Malibu fuel economy, combined (4 cyl, 6 speed trans.): Gas 26 mpg. (9.0 litres/100 km.) E85 18 mpg. (13.1 litres/100 km.) Will E85 be cheaper to purchase? Yeah, right.