2025 Subaru WRX tS Review -- STI? What STI?

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

2025 Subaru WRX tS

Powertrain

2.4-liter turbocharged horizontally-opposed "boxer" four-cylinder (271 horsepower @ 5,600 RPM, 258 lb-ft @ 2,000-5,200 RPM)

Transmission/Drive Wheels

Six-speed manual, all-wheel drive

Fuel Economy, MPG

19 city / 26 highway / 22 combined (EPA Rating)

Fuel Economy, L/100km

12.4 city / 9.0 highway / 10.9 combined (NRCan Rating)

Base Price

$45,705 (U.S.) / $47,795 (Canada)

As-Tested Price

N/A / $50,385 (Canada)

Disclaimer: Prices include N/A destination charge in the United States and $2,195 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

I've been a bit tough on the most recent version of the Subaru WRX, which is funny since a decade ago I wanted a WRX in a bad way. I've also been bummed that Subaru binned the STI trim. But the 2025 Subaru WRX tS does a lot to make me not miss the STI.

The tS not only gets you most of the STI experience without the boy-racer looks, it also makes up for the sins of the TR and offers more fun than the Premium -- enough to offset the car's general flaws. As fun as the Premium can be, it can't say that.

Opt for the tS, and you get electronically controlled dampers tuned by STI (which stands for Subaru Tecnica International), Brembo brakes with six-piston calipers up front and dual-piston calipers in the rear, Ultrasuede Recaro front seats, 19-inch wheels, and Subaru's EyeSight driver-assistance tech.

If you can't drive a manual transmission, too bad -- this one is available only with a six-speed stick. Save the manuals!

Underhood is a turbocharged 2.4-liter horizontally-opposed "boxer" making 271 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque. Yes, it's a bummer that the tS has the same amount of power as the "lesser" trims, but not that much of one -- the WRX has had plenty of grunt across the board.

Is this one all-wheel drive? Did you have to ask? Well, if you must -- the answer is yes. It's a Subie, after all.

My complaints about the WRX have been thus -- the Premium was fun, but not quite fun enough to overcome a dated design and stiff ride. The TR, meanwhile, came across as too track-focused, and not only that, it wasn't much more fun to drive than the Premium, despite making sacrifices that enhance track driving but make street driving, especially commuting, into a punishing slog.

Here, then, is the Goldilocks solution, at least if you take price out of the equation, since the tS requires a much higher cash outlay. The tS handles even better than the Premium, but without the ride sacrifice required by the TR. It's engaging to drive and reminds me of why the WRX has so often captured the imagination of us keyboard-warrior auto scribes. It's just damn fun to toss into a corner -- no matter which drive mode you're in.

And while the extra cash doesn't buy more horsepower or more twist, the engine still has enough grunt to power you out of said corner with alacrity.

That's not to say the dynamics are perfect -- the ride, while less punishing than the TR, is still on the stiff side. Potholed, pock-marked pavement grinds the driver down sooner rather than later.

Some body roll shows up during hard cornering, too. A tad too much.

The engine also remains high strung and high-revving, no matter how you match it with the gearbox. That's good when you need to access the power band for acceleration -- and peak torque is accessible as low as 2,000 RPM -- but not so good when it comes to fuel economy. Or a quiet sixth-gear interstate cruise.

This bad boy is also noisy in ways both good and bad. Good, in that it can sound sporty when you're pushing hard. Bad in that it sounds coarse at idle. The freeway droning, even at light-throttle cruise, is also annoying.

The clutch takeup is a tad abrupt but you get used to it. The shifter, meanwhile, was a bit loose.

The WRX's biggest flaw, non-dynamic division, is that it's just, well, old. The exterior design has aged well but the cabin, which seemed dated before, is showing its age. There's also too much plastic body cladding on the outside and too much cheap-feeling hard plastic on the inside. For $45K, you expect more. As controversial as the haptic-touch interior controls of the similarly-priced Volkswagen Golf R are, at least the cabin in that car looks the price.

That said, looks and feel aren't everything, and the content level for the WRX tS is price-point appropriate. Sure, the moonroof goes away, but in addition to the above-mentioned performance features, the tS nets you heated front seats, blind-spot detection with lane-change alert and rear cross-traffic alert, LED exterior lighting (including fog lamps), Harman Kardon audio, Bluetooth, keyless entry and starting, and USB-C/USB-A ports.

Subaru didn't send me a Monroney, but the car is listed on the company's Web site as starting at $45,705 before fees. The configurator isn't live for building and pricing, either.

I still miss the Subaru WRX STI -- or, at least, I miss that car's performance. Its looks were always over-the-top, at least to my eye. But the Subaru WRX tS gets you at least 75 percent of the old STI's performance abilities while being easier on the eyes. It's a well-done package, though like all WRXs it suffers from being rough around the edges and having a down-market feel in some aspects.

If Subaru can modernize the cabin and smooth off the rough edges without sacrificing performance, the WRX would be a stronger competitor in the compact sport sedan/hatch game, and the tS would be the one to get. As it stands, the tS does a pretty dang good job replacing the STI.

[Images © 2025 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Linda Moore Linda Moore on Apr 24, 2025

    Cars is great to ride in and go to indian to Chicago or to mississippi . Its a great Bruick,ford and cars with future computers is the great in riding in a car but we need to see the rode to.

    By Connoe As linda moore

  • Chris Chris on Feb 19, 2026

    The body style is one of the draws of the WRX as well as the performance aspect. This new Gen looks like every other 4door sedan. It has no style. No defining marker. It looks almost like an older Civic Si with a Subaru badge.

    Bring back style in car body design.

  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
  • Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
Next