QOTD: How Do We Fight the Speeding Surveillance State?

by Tim Healey

Published: August 13th, 2024

qotd how do we fight the speeding surveillance state

I am a firm believer that while excessive speeding is dangerous and bad, not all speeding is.

For example, driving 11 mph over the limit on the freeway in a well-maintained car when you're dead sober and paying complete attention isn't that dangerous. Driving 60 mph in a school zone is.

I also firmly believe that speeding enforcement is often more about revenue collection than safety.

So this news about a new Ford patent didn't sit well with me.

Then again, it's not like speed cameras are a new thing. Automated speed enforcement has both been around a while and will almost certainly be here to stay.

So how do we, as drivers and car enthusiasts fight back without sounding like speed-addled maniacs? None of us want to sound like Grand Theft Auto should be emulated. We don't want to come across as sympathetic to truly dangerous driving.

But we also want to not have our wallets lightened if we wander 7 mph per over the limit, nor do we like it when municipalities set limits too low in order to raise money. We're fine with speed limits, as long as they're based in safety and not lining government coffers.

Most importantly, how can we get towns and cities to cut down on automated tech used to issues tickets?

You know what to do.

Sound off below.

[Image: Ford]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#Ford #QOTD #QuestionOfTheDay #Speeding #Privacy #Surveillance

Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 200 comments

D K on Aug 25, 2024
Drive the speed limit. It won't kill you. Literally.

1 Reply
ToolGuy on Aug 28, 2024
I bet the 200th comment on this writeup will be completely meaningless.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Scott Did they start at Clarkson's Farm? (No other questions matter...)
Carfan94 According to Wikipedia the Highlander went into production in November 2000. Inaccuracy much?
MaintenanceCosts I have a 2016 with the late and very much missed V6 hybrid powertrain. It’s as interesting to drive as a toaster, but I can’t deny that it just does everything we want it to do without ever complaining, despite relentless neglect (at least cosmetic neglect; it’s well maintained mechanically). It’s perfectly happy taking the kids to school or carrying all of us and our luggage over 10,000-foot passes at 85 mph. Very fit for purpose.
Bd2 Santa Fe is so much better because its Hyundai
28-Cars-Later M'eh. The Toyota Harrier is really what got the fail going in 1998, this was merely the Toyota equivalent using it's US platform and operations. This and the Harrier by themselves I don't think are bad per se, but variety is the spice of life and we lost that a while back in car choices *because* of this and the Harrier.