Infiniti Drops Final Sedan in Lineup
Infiniti announced a series of changes to its 2025 lineup this week, including confirmation that the Q50 sedan would be discontinued this year. While we already basically knew this would be the case, the 2024 Infiniti Q50 will be the final model year — making the brand yet another company selling nothing but crossovers and SUVs.
Sales of the Infiniti Q50 had also been on the decline for years. The model saw 44,007 U.S. deliveries in 2016. But that number declined to a paltry 6,201 by 2023.
Part of that is due to the vehicle’s age. Production of the Q50 commenced in 2013, with deliveries commencing the following years. Despite seeing some performance updates between then and now, it lacks a lot of the modern technologies that automakers are obsessed with these days.
Your author would suggest that this should make the vehicle even more desirable considering how consumer surveys routinely show how fed up people are with touchscreens and modern UX. Truth be told, the base Q50 was already more engaging to drive with the 300-horsepower V6 than most SUVs. The Red Sport 400 raised that number to 400 horsepower, though retained the very smooth and enjoyable 7-speed automatic. There was, quite frankly, a lot for enthusiasts to like about the vehicle.
But it was an old model and automakers rarely keep anything in production for more than a few years. Take the Dodge Charger, as an example. It was enjoying sales figures the Q50 could have only dreamed of right up until it’s final year. But Stellantis still deemed it insufficiently modern and is now launching a revamped version that utilizes a smaller, more complicated engine or entirely electric powertrain.
The only real difference is that Dodge was very clearly trying to sell as many Chargers as possible until the assembly line shut down, whereas I’ve heard rumors that getting Nissan to allocate Q50 sedans was sometimes made intentionally tricky. We’ll likely never know for certain if that was the case, but Infiniti clearly wasn’t going out of its way to advertise the model in its later years.
Automakers have been trying to exploit U.S. regulatory loopholes, as emission requirements have become increasingly strict. In 2011, the U.S. government revised corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards to incorporate a vehicle’s size based on its wheelbase and track width. Vehicles considered SUVs and pickups were also given additional leeway, effectively encouraging every manufacturer vying to sell products inside America to prioritize those vehicle types over sedans.
Ironically, it was the United States’ own regulatory standards that resulted in automakers pivoting toward increasingly large and inefficient models. Sedans may traditionally be lighter and more fuel efficient than other vehicle types. But sporting variants equipped with larger engines can create additional compliance issues for automakers, who have already realized that SUVs tend to yield higher profit margins anyway.
This also makes any future Infiniti sedans easier to anticipate. The brand’s most recent prototype to feature four doors, that wasn’t an SUV, was the Vision Qe concept. Handsome, the vehicle was said to “represent a vision of Infiniti’s electrified future.” It seems likely that any hypothetical successor to the Q50 would follow a similar trajectory to Dodge’s Charger. It will be promoted as an all-electric product, with there being a chance that there might be a combustion variant utilizing a smaller powertrain than its predecessor.
That said, considering the brand’s declining market share over the last two decades, there’s also a chance that we might never see another sedan wearing the Infiniti badge. This isn’t even a condemnation of the company. North America simply has seen the financial demographic prone toward buying entry level luxury vehicles evaporate these last few decades. When the average allegedly cannot afford to purchase even the most budget oriented automobiles, they’re certainly not going to start shopping upmarket at Infiniti.
[Images: Infiniti]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Peeryog Everytime I see one I am reminded of the current Santa Fe. And vice versa.
- Original Guy I watched that Moscow parade thing. (With the Cyrillic captions because my Russian is a little rough.) I won't give the whole thing away, but it started off with a couple of dudes riding around in stupid useless convertibles, standing up like Hitler, who I'm pretty sure was an actual Nazi. They drove around in circles and kept stopping to ask if anyone had seen all the missing military equipment, and all the guys kept moaning back, that no, they hadn't, ask the next section of guys.They looked around for someone shorter and sicker-looking than Putin but they were unsuccessful so they let him speak.The North Korean military was there, I guess the invasion has begun. The North Korean guys were skinny but their rifles were nicely polished, I guess they have plenty of time on their hands between meals.Some of the Russian military guys carried little white flags, I assume they keep those handy in case they run across any U.S. Marines.
- Marc J Rauch EBFlexing on ur mom - Ethanol is compatible with more types of rubber, plastic, and metal than gasoline and aromatics. This means that ethanol is less corrosive. The bottom line is that long before ethanol could have any damaging effect on any engine component, gasoline and aromatics would have already damaged the components. And the addition of ethanol doesn't exacerbate the problems caused by gasoline and aromatics; it actually helps mitigate them.
- Original Guy Today I learned that a reverse brake bleeder (and a long borescope) can be helpful if you are autistic and don't have any friends and no one wants to work with you to bleed your brakes. Also it is quick, once you figure out the process.When Canada assembled my truck back in circa 1995, they apparently used a different clip to attach the brake pedal (and switch) to the brake booster than what is technically called for. It is tough to realize this when the spring steel clip flies off to who knows where. Of course I ordered the wrong clip trying to match the style that I saw buried up in the dash before it flew away. My truck now has the 'correct' clip, everyone can relax.I ordered some more brake fluid (DOT 3, nothing fancy) but it turns out I still have two fresh bottles (my shelves aren't empty, I just have too many shelves).Went to install my fancy new Optima YellowTop battery and it turns out I need a new side post terminal bolt. (Yet another order placed, bring on THE TARIFFS.) It would be a shame to strip out the threads on a nice new battery, no?Good news: The longer it takes me to get my truck started again, the more I save on fuel. 😁
- Normie Weekends here would be a great time for everyone to join in praise of dog dish hubcaps on body-color matched steelies!
Comments
Join the conversation
I don't drive. Houses are more my thing
Due to the realities of physics, smaller and lighter vehicles, powered by the same power plants, will have better fuel efficiency compared to larger and heavier variants, such as CUVs and SUVs.
Also, due to the realities of physics, smaller, lighter, and lower center of gravity vehicles perform better, and are overall safer to operate.
The trends towards heavier and taller CUVs and SUVs is a result of human ignorance.
How So?
In my own personal experiences, and according to multiply studies I have read, there continues to be a belief that drivers and their family passengers are safer and more protected in larger, heavier, and taller vehicles.
The reality of vehicle safety testing has shown and proven time and again, the safer and safest vehicles are those that can better handle the physics of driving.
That means, if your vehicle can steer quicker, more directly, can accelerate, as well as brake with greater control, then the driver can avoid accidents to a much greater degree. Those factors favor smaller and lighter vehicles that have a lower center of gravity.
Even with a performance vehicle such as Porsche, their SUVs can never match the performance, safety, and efficiency of their non CUV SUV counterparts.
CUVs, and SUVs are counter to better fuel and energy efficiency, as well as better and safer driving performance.
Little Bobby and Rochelle are not safer in a larger SUV compared to a smaller, lighter coupe or sedan that has equal safety design.
But then, we live in a time when science and reality are dismissed as lies in preference to one's personal beliefs, because belief is not only equal to fact, but belief if superior to fact.
Oh well.