TTAC'S Ten Best and Ten Worst is Back for 2018 - Get Your Nominations In [UPDATED]
That’s right – we’re doing that thing again where we, the TTAC tastemakers, pick our best and worst cars of 2018. And by “we” I also mean you, the B&B.
Just like the last time we did this, you’re invited to submit your nominations. More on that in a second. There won’t be any prizes this time around, but you might get your words splashed across these virtual pages, and isn’t that reward enough?
We’re living in an era in which a great many cars are good, but bad ones still lurk. So, with your help, we’re going to sort the best from the rest, and the worst of the lot will get what’s coming to them.
We could just ask you what the best and worst driver’s cars are, but that’s too easy. However, we don’t want to muck things up too much by creating all sorts of price and class categories.
[UPDATE: It’s become clear to me that some of you are using the comments instead of our survey link. In order to make sure your vote counts, CLICK HERE]
Therefore, we’ll be using the rules from before, with slight tweaks. And the same criteria, also tweaked.
Rules and specifics regarding the nominating process will be listed below. Before we get there, let’s lay out some basic guidelines that will help you narrow down your choices.
Styling: As before, this can go in either direction. Does a car catch your eye because it’s beautiful, or do you want to ask the designer what drugs he or she was on when the styling was penned? There’s beauty out there, and ugliness, and looks are but one key factor into what makes a car great, or not so great.
Intangibles: If you find yourself asking why a given car exists, or how an automaker built something great despite there being a poor business case, you’re thinking about intangibles. Does a given model make no sense? Or are you happy that the car guys beat the accountants to produce something wonderful?
Tech: Comfort, convenience, safety, driver assistance – a wave of convenience and cutting edge niceties has flooded the market. Few cars remain untouched. Points can be earned or deducted here by how an automaker allots tech across its lineup (in addition to how well it works). Some cars may be laden with unnecessary tech for the price point, while others are too barren with respect to the dollars spent.
Rental Factor: It’s not just about what car is fun to drive or offers value for the money or is good to look at it (or the opposite of those factors). It’s also about a visceral reaction. What car would you avoid on a rental lot, or would you judge your neighbor for buying? Conversely, what car are you secretly hoping to get a chance to drive, or even ride in?
Rules? Yes, there are rules. Here they are:
- Any car or light truck offered for sale for the 2018 or 2019 model year is eligible – provided it is currently on sale. Any vehicle that hasn’t hit dealer lots yet is ineligible, even if it will be available by year’s end. Price, class, automaker, country of origin, sales numbers – none of that really matters. If a vehicle is a car or light truck, a 2018 or 2019 model, and on sale in the United States as of October 15, 2018, it’s eligible.
- Please don’t be lazy with your nominations. Really think about them and put forth your reasoning. Go beyond “it’s good” or “it’s bad.” Do so in order to challenge yourself, and also so your prose may be included in our write-ups.
- Vehicles that are virtually identical in all but badging may be nominated as a team.
- Since some vehicles will get both Best and Worst nods, we’ll assign a score based on the net difference. So if a car gets 30 Best nods and 20 Worst, it will be given 10 Best marks.
- The staff will select 20 finalists for each category, based on how you present your nomination reasoning and our own opinions of each vehicle.
- Readers will then vote on the final 40.
- You’ll have until October 22nd to get all your nominations in – please do so by 5 pm Central time that day. After we cull the nominations, you’ll have until October 31st to finalize your voting.
[Image: Shutterstock/Tomertu]
Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.
More by Tim Healey
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- 6.2deadlifters Because of the current administration no cheap car can exist. US worker SalariesUS sourced materials with costs from US salaries aquiring materials.US UnionsUS corporationsTARIFFS against trade partnersAll these things prevent a 'good' 'reliable' 20,000$ 4-door 4-passanger car capable of 4-start offset and side impact crash protection.Game-Set-Match, end of line. No possible outcome. No discussion possible. every american loses.
- Forward Observer The last time I had a door off my truck I hung it from my Little Giant ladder. But I was only replacing the hinge pins.I'm sorry if this sounds smarmy or smug, I am working on my people skills. (My therapist says I have a long way to go to catch up with some of you.) Would smarmy and smug come in handy if I worked for an automotive dealership? (I wonder.)
- Arthur Dailey Auto 'journalists' should stop referencing the average new car purchase price and instead report on the mean price. We all understand that the glue of luxury vehicles and full size pickups inflate the average price.For me, 'affordable' hovers around the $35k mark.Under current N.A. standards, hatchbacks, stations wagons and non-luxury coupes are basically a lost cause.Personally I would like to see Canada convert to accepting vehicles that have passed the European standards, rather than adhering only to N.A. standards. That would allow for the importation of vehicles such as Dacias, Skodas, and yes more Fiats. Also some models for Japanese and Korean manufacturers that currently are not sold in North America. It may even help Mitsubishi in the Canadian market and allow for the return of Suzuki. Having more small, affordable vehicles available is not a bad thing.
- The original ToolGuy™ Doubt we will see any new vehicle in the low 20s unless it is an EV and Chinese but wouldn't count on that happening. Not against more affordable vehicles but don't foresee that happening in the immediate future.Jeffs do you do any research before making ignorant comments? We have brand new vehicles sold today in the low 20s including the Hyundai Venue that starts at $20,550.
- KwikShiftPro4X That ship has sailed. The new overvalued cheap/base car will be $30G.
Comments
Join the conversation
Worse run company - Ford Worse CEO - Hackett Worse Stock - Ford 25% decrease in a year. 8.50 USD What a disgrace!!!!
BEST: Ford Mustang - old fashioned petrol head fun Jaguar I Pace - the best made electric car today without an I Pad for a centre console. Range Rover - the best luxury 4x4 WORST: Anything made by Honda - sorry their cars are boring however reliable they might be. I think for me in shaming Honda it says a lot about the modern car industry. If I was to buy the least reliable car on sale today I might lose 3 days in an auto repair shop but get a nice replacement car. That for me is fine as boring cars suck!