Any Electric Mazda Will Actually Be a Toyota

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Of all automakers, no company holds out hope for the gasoline engine’s longevity quite like Mazda. Not only does Mazda anticipate many decades of continued hydrocarbon-fueled driving, it’s also ensuring gas stays viable by inventing a new Skyactiv engine that (supposedly) uses much less of it. That motor, a first-of-its-kind gas compression ignition four-cylinder, debuts in 2019.

For now, Mazda’s North American lineup remains pure in terms of propulsion. The promised CX-5 diesel is taking its sweet time showing up, and neither a hybrid or EV can be found among the model ranks. That will soon change, but given Mazda’s size and finances, it won’t be a Mazda platform underpinning the next Mazda EV.

Back in August, Toyota announced it was acquiring a 5-percent stake in its Japanese rival, with the two companies consummating their new relationship with a plan for a $1.6 billion U.S. assembly plant. The joint venture would focus on sharing EV technology and building vehicles for the North American market. Now, we know a little more about that plan.

Announced late last week, Toyota, Mazda and Denso Corporation have signed an agreement to “jointly develop basic structural technologies for electric vehicles,” with the effort carrying a new corporate name: EV C.A. Spirit Co., Ltd.

Toyota is fronting 90 percent of the bill, with Denso and Mazda ponying up the remaining 10 percent.

Acknowledging that many automakers don’t have billions to toss around at every automotive tech trend, Toyota said the three companies will work on architecture capable of “covering a wide variety of vehicle segments and types to ensure flexible and rapid response to market trends.” EVs still represent a tiny slice of the market pie, but it’s a growing one. With governments the world over cracking down on vehicle emissions, Toyota feels the investment is worthwhile.

For Mazda, it’s a guarantee the automaker won’t be left in the technological dust if the EV scene really takes off. Headquartered in Japan, the new company brings together Denso’s electronics technologies, Mazda’s “bundled product planning and prowess in computer modeling-based development,” and Toyota’s versatile TNGA platform (found under the 2018 Camry). This means any future EV with a Mazda badge will have Toyota bones under its clothes.

Vehicle swapping between the two brands isn’t new. The Toyota Yaris iA is simply a badge-engineered Mazda 2. However, the two brands’ identities are quite different, with Mazda being seen as the sportier, more driving-focused of the two.

Clearly worried that consumers might anticipate the watering-down of the brand, Toyota claims the two companies “intend to focus their resources on fundamental vehicle values to enable the creation of appealing EVs that embody the unique identities of each brand and avoid the commoditization of EVs.”

In other words, a Mazda EV won’t have the driving dynamics, or appearance, of a engineless Toyota Prius C. The brand’s design language should remain intact, even with an electric powertrain and Toyota chassis.

Toyota claims the common architecture should be capable of underpinning electric SUVs and light trucks, as well as passenger car configurations. While no new timeline details emerged from the announcement, Toyota has already stated the joint assembly plant will be in operation in 2021.

[Image: Toyota]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 9 comments
  • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on Oct 02, 2017

    Sergio is FUMING.

  • Conundrum Conundrum on Oct 02, 2017

    Mr Willems, the SkyActiv X engine is NOT pure compression ignition. By now you should have read the C/D article on the engine - it's been up for over two weeks. The engine is dubbed SCCI, Spark Controlled Compression Ignition. Worth learning how it works because it may well be important. All these EVs being released for sale make me laugh. Where's the market? It'll take years and years to develop, and meanwhile all the snobs with money will drive Elon Musk's dream and be so self-satisfied, it'll be sickening to watch them prat about acting smug. Wait, that's happening already. As Bloomberg said today, Tesla has $10 billion in loans and not 10 cents in profit.

    • PandaBear PandaBear on Oct 06, 2017

      Carpool lane access -> market. People don't mind wasting a few bucks just to get a shorter commute time.

  • Forward Observer Tesla cash on hand is $45 billion. That is a large mattress.Ford Motor Company market cap is $46 billion. Wait, forget I said that.
  • Pianoboy57 I would never buy this even if i had the money. What makes it so special? Limited Edition? That doesn't mean anything at the BHPH lot.
  • 6.2deadlifters Because of the current administration no cheap car can exist. US worker SalariesUS sourced materials with costs from US salaries aquiring materials.US UnionsUS corporationsTARIFFS against trade partnersAll these things prevent a 'good' 'reliable' 20,000$ 4-door 4-passanger car capable of 4-start offset and side impact crash protection.Game-Set-Match, end of line. No possible outcome. No discussion possible. every american loses.
  • Forward Observer The last time I had a door off my truck I hung it from my Little Giant ladder. But I was only replacing the hinge pins.I'm sorry if this sounds smarmy or smug, I am working on my people skills. (My therapist says I have a long way to go to catch up with some of you.) Would smarmy and smug come in handy if I worked for an automotive dealership? (I wonder.)
  • Arthur Dailey Auto 'journalists' should stop referencing the average new car purchase price and instead report on the mean price. We all understand that the glue of luxury vehicles and full size pickups inflate the average price.For me, 'affordable' hovers around the $35k mark.Under current N.A. standards, hatchbacks, stations wagons and non-luxury coupes are basically a lost cause.Personally I would like to see Canada convert to accepting vehicles that have passed the European standards, rather than adhering only to N.A. standards. That would allow for the importation of vehicles such as Dacias, Skodas, and yes more Fiats. Also some models for Japanese and Korean manufacturers that currently are not sold in North America. It may even help Mitsubishi in the Canadian market and allow for the return of Suzuki. Having more small, affordable vehicles available is not a bad thing.
Next