Shocker: Study Shows Americans Aren't Interested in Owning EVs, Prefer Better Gas Mileage Instead
The electric vehicle revolution, if you want to call it that, won’t happen in the “I woke up and everything was different” manner envisioned by hard-core EV enthusiasts.
EVs are no longer new to the automotive scene, but there’s still a vast gulf between the opinions of politicians and automakers and that of the buying public. Not surprisingly, the vast majority of Americans polled in a recent study say they aren’t ready or willing to add an electric vehicle to their household.
The Reportlinker Insight survey, conducted in mid August, targeted a representative sample of the population, and found that 81 percent of respondents weren’t ready to take a chance on an EV.
There’s a host of issues with battery electric vehicles — cost, range, durability and recharging infrastructure — that are holding back sales. When asked about the drawbacks of EV ownership, 33 percent of respondents listed undeveloped recharging infrastructure as the biggest barrier to ownership. Cost of acquisition ranked highest for 21 percent of respondents, while a further 15 percent cited the speed of a recharge.
These issues should improve incrementally, with a looming crop of 200-plus mile EVs in the $30,000–$35,000 range poised to flood trickle into showrooms and driveways over the next few years. None of them are trucks, which consumers love with a burning passion. Meanwhile, the rollout of private and public charging stations continues at a very modest pace. Even the most enthusiastic EV die-hard must realize that the revolution won’t come with a bang.
According to the study, Americans aren’t even sold on the idea of EVs being the logical successor to traditional fuel vehicles. Of the respondents, 43 percent say the best alternative to gas- and diesel-powered vehicles are more efficient fossil fuel-powered vehicles. 29 percent say hybrid (plug-in) electric vehicles were a better alternative. Only 12 percent believe fully electric vehicles should drive us into the future.
Millennials are the outlier to this question. For a number of reasons, including current vehicle ownership (or lack thereof), location and lifestyle, 48 percent of younger adults said hybrid and battery electric vehicles are the best alternative. You can just image the ad teams prepping Millennial-focused marketing campaigns for those future models. Cue the banjos, straw hats and jam sessions on the front steps.
When asked when they expected to see mass adoption of electric vehicles, 37 percent of respondents said it won’t happen until 2035. The second-largest group of respondents — 26 percent — expect it by 2025.
Tesla has signed up 373,000 would-be buyers for its upcoming Model 3, but the brand’s near-mythical status surely plays a role in the public’s enthusiasm for that model. The real test of the public’s EV appetite comes when the Chevrolet Bolt, next-generation Nissan Leaf and other “regular” EVs hit the market.
[Image: Tesla Motors]
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
It is funny that all the ridiculous "oil conspiracies" about why we don't have an electric car and "secret" technology was all fever swamp nonsense. I see EVs taking over eventually, but the idea we could all be driving electric cars decades ago was nonsense. So decades now we will still have most vehicles powered by fossil fuels, it will just be power plants burning them instead.
We've seen the Golden Age of the Automobile and it has lasted for 25 years now. We are very fortunate, in that respect.