Toyota Partners With Exxon to Test Low-Carbon Fuels

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Toyota Motor Corp has announced it will be partnering with Exxon to develop a low-carbon fuel that can be used in gasoline engines. Considering that governments around the world are introducing stringent carbon emission standards, this seems like a worthwhile endeavor. However, Toyota also likes to throw spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks, and previous attempts to deliver on similar concepts have fallen flat.


Ethanol arguably turned out to be worse for the environment than gasoline and pretty tough on small motors, despite originally being framed as “green,” since the process of harvesting and then producing the corn-based fuel typically ends up dumping more pollution into the atmosphere. Meanwhile, Toyota has been goofing around with hydrogen power for decades and the technology has yet to advance to a point where it could be considered anywhere near carbon neutral.


Exxon has also piloted some schemes that never took off. In 2018, the company was talking a big game about biofuels sourced from algae. But they were having trouble overcoming the same problems posed by biofuels made from corn or sugarcane. Growing enough of the stuff was difficult and finding a way to refine it into fuel created a slew of logistical issues that meant more energy had to be expended.


That’s not to say the above concepts cannot work or shouldn’t have been pursued. We just never reached the kind of efficiencies that would make them viable alternatives to petroleum.


But the duo seem to have a good feeling about these lower carbon fuels, which Toyota claimed “are compatible with older vehicles as well as its current model line-up” and have the “potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from road transportation up to 75 [percent] compared to conventional fuels available today.”


Though the accompanying video (which was all Toyota offered that expanded on the concept) didn’t have much more to offer. The automaker basically claimed that it wanted to have a diverse portfolio so it could best adapt to changing regulatory landscapes. But it also noted that energy demand is poised to go up by 30 percent through 2050. Having a bigger toolkit likely doesn’t hurt, especially when you’re a company that’s big enough to explore an array of new technologies.


Sadly, it sounds like these low-carbon fuels aren’t all that different from the other biofuels we’ve seen flop. The corporate partners just said that they’d come from cleaner feedstocks and should be a relatively seamless way to make older powertrains more emissions-compliant.


Bloomberg had more:


The fuels are “very much at the test phase” and would require government policy support before becoming commercially available, [Andrew Madden, Exxon’s vice president for strategy and planning] said in a Wednesday interview. They’re mostly a mix of existing feedstocks like renewable biomass and ethanol produced using cleaner processes, he said.
“Having a solution for liquid fuels that we can use in the existing fleet, having it in the kind of policy construct where we allow the market to innovate, is the lowest cost way to decarbonize transportation,” Madden said.


“No matter what you think the pace of electrification transition might be, there will be a billion, if not hundreds of millions of vehicles on the road for quite a long time,” said Tom Stricker, Toyota’s vice president for sustainability and regulatory affairs. “ quite important in achieving those greenhouse gas reductions quickly.”


That could be. But we’ve also seen Japanese companies leaning back into hydrogen vehicles while German automakers have started touting the benefits of synthetic fuels alleged to offer similar carbon-reduction benefits. Meanwhile, the United States government continues to incentivize electric cars as the true pathway toward more-sustainable transportation.


There are a lot of options out there and none of them have managed to dethrone fossil fuels just yet. But a mixed approach, which is definitely Toyota’s modus operandi, doesn’t sound like a bad plan as the world attempts to sort all this out. Heck, maybe the industry will simply fall back into developing more-efficient combustion engines if these low-carbon fuels work out. Stranger things have happened.


[Image: CC7/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Since adding automotive writing to his repertoire, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, discussed the status of the automotive sector on national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone should ever have to. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. Alleged to be contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Forward Observer Tesla cash on hand is $45 billion. That is a large mattress.Ford Motor Company market cap is $46 billion. Wait, forget I said that.
  • Pianoboy57 I would never buy this even if i had the money. What makes it so special? Limited Edition? That doesn't mean anything at the BHPH lot.
  • 6.2deadlifters Because of the current administration no cheap car can exist. US worker SalariesUS sourced materials with costs from US salaries aquiring materials.US UnionsUS corporationsTARIFFS against trade partnersAll these things prevent a 'good' 'reliable' 20,000$ 4-door 4-passanger car capable of 4-start offset and side impact crash protection.Game-Set-Match, end of line. No possible outcome. No discussion possible. every american loses.
  • Forward Observer The last time I had a door off my truck I hung it from my Little Giant ladder. But I was only replacing the hinge pins.I'm sorry if this sounds smarmy or smug, I am working on my people skills. (My therapist says I have a long way to go to catch up with some of you.) Would smarmy and smug come in handy if I worked for an automotive dealership? (I wonder.)
  • Arthur Dailey Auto 'journalists' should stop referencing the average new car purchase price and instead report on the mean price. We all understand that the glue of luxury vehicles and full size pickups inflate the average price.For me, 'affordable' hovers around the $35k mark.Under current N.A. standards, hatchbacks, stations wagons and non-luxury coupes are basically a lost cause.Personally I would like to see Canada convert to accepting vehicles that have passed the European standards, rather than adhering only to N.A. standards. That would allow for the importation of vehicles such as Dacias, Skodas, and yes more Fiats. Also some models for Japanese and Korean manufacturers that currently are not sold in North America. It may even help Mitsubishi in the Canadian market and allow for the return of Suzuki. Having more small, affordable vehicles available is not a bad thing.
Next