Jeep Recalling Over 1 Million Vehicles Due to Fire Risk
Jeep has decided to recall more than 1 million Wrangler and Gladiator models that pose a potential fire risk. Based on documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the potential hazard persists even when the vehicle is not running.
As you might expect, the resulting safety recommendation is for owners to keep affected vehicles parked outside and away from other structures. The culprit for the defect is faulty wiring on the electric hydraulic power steering pump on Gladiators and Wranglers from the 2021–2025 model years.
The official recall count pertains to 1,076,699 vehicles, which should be every single example produced within the relevant timeframe. On the upside, Stellantis estimated that only about 0.1 percent of the whole population actually possesses the defect.
Based on the report, the issue stems from connections within the electro-hydraulic power steering pump being susceptible to high resistance. A surplus of resistance creates excess heat and, in some cases, can cause the surrounding materials to combust.
Older units used belt driven pumps. However, early versions of the newer units (which first saw production in 2018) don’t appear to be impacted by the recall. However, they did receive an unrelated steering-focused recall during their first year on the market. The NHTSA likewise has a recall on file for the 2020-2022 Chrysler Pacifica for similar reasons. Another investigation had previously been launched looking into older Pacifica models over complaints about power steering failures.
We’d advise any Stellantis customers noticing issues with their power steering system to have it looked at right away and absolutely consider parking their vehicle outside. If you happen to own one of the models contained within the recall, parking them outdoors becomes non-negotiable.
Stellantis said that it first noticed an issue on the Wrangler and Gladiator leading up to 2023 and launched a preliminary investigation in May of that year. Subsequent customer incidents forced that automaker to revisit the matter in 2024. The NHTSA’s Office of Defect Investigations became involved in September 2024.
Following the NHTSA’s involvement, the manufacturer claims to have continued giving extra attention to all engine fires, hoping to find the “origin and cause while concurrently analyzing data for trends.” It also said it worked with the administration on the problem.
However, federal regulators became impatient and eventually issued an Information Request (as part of investigation PE24-024) in March of 2025. Stellantis (listed in the report as “FCA US Technical Safety and Regulatory Compliance”) complied with the request in May, having claimed to have finally uncovered the source of the problem.
According to the automaker, “FCA US TSRC learned the [Electric Hydraulic Power Steering Pump] header was manufactured out of specified tolerances, resulting in insertion forces which exceed the specification. Increased insertion forces can lead to spread terminals and reduced likelihood the EHPSP electrical connector will be fully connected to the EHPSP header. Both of these conditions can lead to high resistance in the EHPSP electrical connection. Additionally, FCA US TSRC received notification of a terminal push out condition on the EHPSP electrical connector, which can result in high resistance.”
From here, the company attempted to buy back select vehicles and engage in parts analysis while also working to recreate the defect. The automaker met with the NHTSA to discuss its options in November of 2025. The following year resulted in Stellantis/FCA US sending routine reports to regulators on subsequent instances where the defect had created problems, vehicle fires taking top priority.
As of May, the automaker stated that it was aware of 63 customer assistance records and 72 field reports — 35 of which are confirmed to originate at the EHPSP interface. But it said that it was not aware of any accidents and only a singular injury potentially related to this issue for all markets.
The current plan is to simply replace the defective components free of charge. However, dealers won’t be abridged of the situation until later this week and customer notifications aren’t scheduled to commence until July 9. If you’re concerned about your vehicle, you’re encouraged to contact the manufacturer or head over to the NHTSA recall website. The recall code is 26V363.
[Images: Stellantis]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Since adding automotive writing to his repertoire, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, discussed the status of the automotive sector on national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone should ever have to. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. Alleged to be contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Oberkanone Dacia makes product line of affordable vehicles. An entire product line. One vehicle is not the answer for all needs. Dacia does affordable well.
- YaMoBeThere This is an egregiously bad AI generated article, the middle of the article is repeated twice... but yea go ahead and nitpick about my comment pointing that out
- Slavuta Is this Ok if I use OEM all weather floor mats? Yes, the ones that came with 2011 Mazda3 were not good. But the ones in 2017 Mazda6 are excellent. BTW, in that picture, Grand Cherokee on Kumho tires. Is this also an advert or just coincidence?
- Bar170111344 "GM was on track to spend $31.7 billion on compliance technology through 2031."I'll just mention, that expenditure would have gone into research and development, and that would have driven U.S. manufacturing innovation. On the industrial side, R&D is necessary for U.S. manufacturers to remain competitive in the world. It's absolutely no surprise China is running rings around us. The prospective $ savings GM is looking forward to hasn't impressed the stock market. Year-to-date return of -5.65%. -7.05% in the last month. PE 20:1, inflated by the falling share price. Not to be insulting by any stretch, but it has never been like Mary Barra to get out ahead of anything. She's not an innovator and not a risk taker. She's a good engineer.Honestly - in that industry, which I worked in for decades, being regulated is like having a security blanket. You can be mediocre, blame it on regulation, and still make a buck. And with the federal government now digging an even deeper moat around GM and Ford, it's clearly suppressing American innovation and excellence.
- Jks168824641 Mercedes, 2023 GLC 300’s start/stop feature is so smooth and seamless that I hardly notice it. I really appreciate it in slow traffic or drive through lanes for fast food
Comments
Join the conversation
Ford has 40 recalls for the year. FCA is at 19 and GM is at 17.
The Commie Carlos Tavares years were NOT kind to Jeep. Not only should he have not been given his ridiculous golden parachute, but as badly as he screwed everything up they should have demanded he return every penny paid to him during his tenure.
There's a few people here with below-average intelligence here who will rag on other automakers with their recall count, but the fact it took the NHTSA threatening them to get any sort of action after dozens of *confirmed* fires just shows how much lower standards are at Stellantis.
Well, since Ram has a Badge of Protest, maybe Jeep can get a Badge of Burning Protest.
This kind of thing would be less of a problem if lazy caveman incompetent Luddite automotive engineers weren't mired in the (distant) past with 13.8 volt electrical systems.
Ask TTAC: What is typical peak amperage draw with an electric power steering system?
My non-electric hydraulic steering systems work better than your stupid electric power steering system and they don't spontaneously combust. Now get out of my office.
(P.S. Does the all-electric Jeep Wagoneer S have this problem? Asking for a friend.)
As you know I am currently driving a Jeep. The other day I was driving my Jeep and the level of non-refinement from the front of the vehicle seemed slightly egregious even by Jeep standards, so I noodled a little bit and then ordered new front wheel bearing and hub assemblies.
The shelves were not empty, the price was affordable, I did not have to step into an icky dealership. I will let you know if the new parts address the problem, I'm sure you can't wait.
TL;DR: Even if you are stuck with a Jeep, you don't have to lower your standards.
(Just imagine the fuel savings I will see!)
Brings a whole new level of meaning to "death wobble".