General Motors To Fully Ditch Apple CarPlay, Android Auto UPDATED
Update: “We are not making any changes to existing vehicles. If your car supports Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, that will continue. Both will remain available in all GM gas-powered vehicles for the foreseeable future. As we advance toward our centralized computing platform, we’ll gradually move to a better, more deeply integrated experience — a direction the broader industry is taking as vehicles become more software-defined," a GM spokesperson told TTAC in an emailed statement.
"This will happen over time, not overnight. We value our collaboration with Apple and Google and remain focused on delivering experiences customers love.”
General Motors is going even further in its drive to ditch smartphone-mirroring systems.
The company was already going to get rid of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto in its electric vehicles, and now CEO Mary Barra has said that the systems will be going away in its ICE cars, too.
Why? Well, Barra says that getting rid of the systems will reduce distractions as in-house infotainment systems improve.
Right now, you can get these systems in two GM EVs -- the Cadillac Lyriq and GMC Hummer EV. Barra told The Verge's Decoder podcast that systems will leave ICE cars as they undergo generational redesigns or mid-cycle refreshes.
Barra said the systems were too "clunky". From the podcast:
“It wasn’t seamless, and frankly, in some cases, it could be distracting to move back and forth if you were doing something that you could do on a phone projection type of system, versus if you needed to do something in the vehicle.”
She added this:
“When you look at the fact that we have over 40 models across our portfolio, you don’t just do this, and they all update,” said Barra. “As we move forward with each new vehicle and major new vehicle launch, I think you’re going to see us consistent on that. We made a decision to prioritize our EV vehicles during this timeframe, and as we go forward, we’ll continue across the portfolio.”
GM's newest in-house systems will run on Android Automotive, and will run native Android apps. That might lead to frustration for iPhone users.
Here comes the editorializing from the author: I can't say I like this. I am iPhone user, and I like CarPlay because it often performs certain functions better than in-house infotainment systems do. Despite owning several Apple products, I am no Apple fanboy (I do my computing on PCs), but I do prefer to run CarPlay over factory infotainment when testing new cars. Of course, I still mess with in-house infotainment for review purposes, but CarPlay just works really well, and I've seen Android Auto also work well when riding with a Droid user.
To be fair to GM, some of the apps that work well in CarPlay, like Google Maps, will likely be part of the Android system. Still, I have a sneaking suspicion that most iPhone owners will be unhappy.
Anyway, if you're an iPhone owner who likes CarPlay and wants a GM product with an ICE powertrain, you still have time. How much time depends on which vehicle you have your eye on, and its product cycle.
UPDATE: General Motors reached out after publication with this statement, attributable to a GM spokesperson.
“We are not making any changes to existing vehicles. If your car supports Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, that will continue. Both will remain available in all GM gas-powered vehicles for the foreseeable future. As we advance toward our centralized computing platform, we’ll gradually move to a better, more deeply integrated experience — a direction the broader industry is taking as vehicles become more software-defined. This will happen over time, not overnight. We value our collaboration with Apple and Google and remain focused on delivering experiences customers love.”
That doesn't really deny that GM will move away from the systems as it refreshes/redesigns vehicles -- it just means it will be a while before it happens. In other words, it might not be the next refresh or redesign, as I implied before. It could be the next gen or the one after that.
So, GM is planning to make this change -- just not that soon. And if you own a car with one of these systems, you should be fine.
[Image: General Motors]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.
More by Tim Healey
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- EBFlex No....you can find plenty of used "fun" cars that are very reasonable with low miles.What does give me pause is the outrageous insurance and yearly registration fees. I shouldn't have to pay for a full year of road use when I can't use the car for half the year. Another factor is interest rates. The dolt that runs the fed is keeping them high for purely political reasons. They need to come down ASAP.
- 1995 SC I actually really like these. I love the Busso V6. And I will continue to admire them in someone else's driveway like all Alfas. I really want a 4c, but I don't quite hate myself enough
- 1995 SC I actually know a guy with one of these. Coolest Tercel ever. I don't mean anything derogatory by that.
- 1995 SC A Miata can be had for under 30. GTIs are still reasonable as is the Jetta GLI. GR86 is reasonable. Plenty of choices out there. If you look at things like the Mustang now versus even back in the 90s sure, it costs more, but it's performance envelope is also vastly higher.
- 1995 SC No. It gets great gas mileage.
Comments
Join the conversation
So GM is only actually moving away from Apple Carplay and utilizing Android auto as the basis of its in-car OEM system. Makes sense in that Android is open source allowing for infinite customization while Carplay is locked down by Apple. I don't disagree that the wireless phone interface can be cumbersome when you need to reach back to the cars OEM system and functions, that is why physical buttons are so handy but alias consumers are losing that battle as well. Having a software interface that combines the functions of the OEM and your phone on one seamless screen would be nice though with physical buttons it would be redundant. Goodbye buttons hello touch screens...
Mary Barra is ignoring the reality that people live and die with their phones in their hands. When they drive CarPlay/Android Auto lets them continue to be connected to the phone. While a car may have navigation it's not going to know where I have been searching a few hours before. It will not know the curated playlist I made for the trip. It will not seamlessly manage messages and phone calls. Bluetooth connectivity helps but is an unneeded impediment.
Not one CarPlay/Auto user or car dealer has said "please remove my seamless connectivity to my phone so you can force me into your system that lets you sell my data".
I was planning on getting the new Chevy Bolt but no CarPlay means no go. I will probably go with the new Nissan Leaf. CarPlay and Auto are optional, unlike the GM system, which means drivers can choose their own preferred interface and connectivity.