LG's New Battery Tech Promises to Prevent and Shorten EV Fires

by Chris Teague

Published: October 3rd, 2024

lg s new battery tech promises to prevent and shorten ev fires

EV fires are one of the reasons detractors give for avoiding the vehicles, though they don’t flame up at any higher rate than gas models. New battery tech promises to reduce the number of EV fires, however, and one of the companies behind the technology said the components could become self-extinguishing in the future.

LG Chem said it developed a battery material that can help prevent fires and extinguish them when they do happen. The company published a paper in the journal Nature Communications, detailing a new development it calls a “Safety Reinforced Layer.” It uses a composite material that can change its structure under extreme temperatures to help reduce electrical resistance and isolate parts of the battery that cause fires. Once the high temps are no longer an issue, the changes reverse themselves.

LG’s testing showed that piercing conventional lithium cobalt oxide batteries caused fires 84 percent of the time, but adding its technology cut the rate of fires to zero percent. Nickel battery fires dropped from 100 percent to just 30, and the flames burnt out soon after igniting.

The company’s prior efforts failed to deliver a commercially viable product, but this most recent development is far more promising. LG Chem’s CTO, Lee Jong-gu, said, “This is a tangible research achievement that can be applied to mass production in a short period of time. We will enhance safety technology to ensure customers can use electric vehicles with confidence and contribute to strengthening our competitiveness in the battery market.”

[Images: oasisamuel via Shutterstock, Kia, Hyundai]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#LGChem #EVFires #solidstatebatteries

Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 12 comments

3-On-The-Tree 2 days ago
To Khory, I was a firefighter as well and the worst thing about car fires was the fumes from all the plastics and rubber, tires etc.

2 Reply
Zerofoo Yesterday
I was told EV fires are fake news.

1 Reply
- John 9 hours ago
  Spoken like a Republican’t❗️🦤
  
  Like

Recent Comments

FreedMike I actually had a deal in place for a PHEV - a Mazda CX-90 - but it turned out to be too big to fit comfortably in my garage, thus making too difficult to charge, so I passed. But from that, I learned the Truth About PHEVs - they're a VERY niche product, and probably always be, because their use case is rather nebulous. Yes, you can run on EV power for 25-30 miles, plug it in at home on a slow charger, and the next day, you're ready to go again. Great in theory, but in practice, a) you still need a home charger, b) you paid a LOT more for the car than you would have for a standard hybrid, and c) you discover the nasty secret of PHEVs, which is that when they're on battery power, they're absolute pigs to drive. Meanwhile, to maintain its' piglike battery-only performance, it still needs to be charged, so you're running into all the (overstated) challenges that BEV owners have, with none of the performance that BEV owners like. To quote King George in "Hamilton": " Awesome. Wow." In the Mazda's case, the PHEV tech was used as a performance enhancer - which worked VERY nicely - but it's the only performance-oriented PHEV out there that doesn't have a Mercedes-level pricetag. So who's the ideal owner here? Far as I can tell, it's someone who doesn't mind doing his 25 mile daily commute in a car that's slow as f*ck, but also wants to take the car on long road trips that would be inconvenient in a BEV. Meanwhile, the MPG Uber Alles buyers are VERY cost conscious - thus the MPG Uber Alles thing - and won't be enthusiastic about spending thousands more to get similar mileage to a standard hybrid. That's why the Volt failed. The tech is great for a narrow slice of buyers, but I think the real star of the PHEV revival show is the same tax credits that many BEVs get.
RHD The speed limit was raised from 62.1 MPH to 68.3 MPH. It's a slight difference which will, more than anything, lower the fines for the guy caught going 140 KPH.
Msquare The argument for unlimited autobahns has historically been that lane discipline is a life-or-death thing instead of a suggestion. That and marketing cars designed for autobahn speeds gives German automakers an advantage even in places where you can't hope to reach such speeds. Not just because of enforcement, but because of road conditions. An old Honda commercial voiced by Burgess Meredith had an Accord going 110 mph. Burgess said, "At 110 miles per hour, we have found the Accord to be quiet and comfortable. At half that speed, you may find it to be twice as quiet and comfortable." That has sold Mercedes, BMW's and even Volkswagens for decades. The Green Party has been pushing for decades for a 100 km/h blanket limit for environmental reasons, with zero success.
Varezhka The upcoming mild-hybrid version (aka 500 Ibrida) can't come soon enough. Since the new 500e is based on the old Alfa Mito and Opel Adam platform (now renamed STLA City) you'd have thought they've developed the gas version together.
Varezhka Supposedly Subaru has turned down Toyota's offer for a next generation BRZ/GR86. I'm expecting Toyota to replace GR86 and GR Corolla with a coupe version of GR Corolla, AKA GR Celica.