Lexus Said It Found Its Mojo By Studying European Rivals' Driving Experiences

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Lexus has long offered comfortable, dependable luxury vehicles, but outside of a small handful of surprisingly engaging performance models, its catalog hasn’t generated the same driving satisfaction as European rivals’. The automaker spent years benchmarking Audi, BMW, Mercedes, and Porsche on handling, body rigidity, and more.


Engineers homed in on body rigidity as a way to gain ground on the Euro brands. They identified several areas where support braces could bring significant advantages, including in the front and rear, as well as in the body’s midsection. The updates are intended to reach every model in the Lexus catalog.


Lexus has been working on this project since 2018 and views it as a way to differentiate its vehicles from those of its competitors. That said, the move could become a risk. Automotive News pointed out that focusing on “on-old school performance” could become a liability as other automakers push forward with more tech and safety features. The publication also noted that high-performing driver’s cars face an uncertain future as the world moves closer to mainstream fully autonomous vehicles.

On the other hand, Lexus could use what it learned from this effort to inform future EV designs. Many new electric models have stunning acceleration, but some lack a solid driving experience to back it up. Though it’s behind most rivals on new EV development, the brand will hopefully employ the lessons from this project to shape electric models going forward.


[Images: Lexus]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 29 comments
  • Akear Akear on Aug 29, 2024
    Everybody dreams of having a Lexus.
    • Bd2 Bd2 on Aug 29, 2024
      But they are choosing Genesis in droves.
  • Joe65688619 Joe65688619 on Aug 31, 2024
    PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE don't follow the Germans with needing different tire sizes for the front and rear wheels. Marginal impact on driving dynamics, huge cost as they can't be rotated and wear differently.
  • SCE to AUX "two days of performance driving school". There go the tires.
  • Pianoboy57 I hope we won't see rows and rows of overpriced high trims models no one will buy. You used to could get Chargers and Road Runners with base level trims that were a little bit above taxi cabs.
  • SCE to AUX "attempted to diffuse some of the tension"... defuse. The union has a point about Stellantis being adrift, but I don't know how any company can promise plant rehab investments and job security if business conditions won't support that. For a few short-term jobs, Stellantis could sink $1.5 billion into a plant that closes again in a few years.
  • SCE to AUX I know the Highlander has been gold for Toyota, but I really hated the 22 I drove while car shopping back then. The drivetrain was ponderous, controls were confusing, interior was cramped, and it rode like a truck. We ended up with the Santa Fe, much to Bd2's delight.
  • Big Al from Oz We had Highlanders for work and they are boring and uneconomical when driven with urgency. I will admit I believe the 2.2l diesel Santa Fe's and Sorento's are a better vehicle choice.
Next