Biden Administration to Issue More Than Half a Billion Dollars for EV Charging Infrastructure

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Despite a massive cash investment and the government’s push to build more charging stations, the United States’ EV infrastructure needs more work. President Biden’s team aims to improve the situation with even more funding, to the tune of $521 million.


The funds will go to 30 states with a goal of building more chargers in underserved locations. The White House said that there are now more than 192,000 public charging points in the country, almost double the number in 2021, and noted that around 1,000 new chargers come online every week.


Biden promised to build half a million new chargers by 2030, with $7.5 billion in funding coming from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill. Even so, progress has been excruciatingly slow. Earlier this year, the Washington Post reported that the administration’s push had only delivered seven charging stations with 38 plugs.


Funds will be used differently depending on the state, with some areas focusing on building out rural charging infrastructure and installing chargers at multi-unit homes like apartments and condos. California will get $102 million to build a network of chargers and hydrogen fueling stations along commercial freight lines, and Maryland will see $33 million to build chargers in “disadvantaged communities.”

It's easy to bellyache about tax dollars funding something that many people don’t care about or like, but the fact is that the country’s underdeveloped charging network remains a significant hurdle for many people. The lack of charging options for apartment dwellers and people living in sparsely populated regions makes EV ownership difficult or even impossible in some cases, so an improvement in the charging situation will make it possible to get more people behind the wheel of an EV.


[Images: Mark Youso, woodsnorthphoto, Around the World Photos via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 107 comments
  • Namesakeone It should be a name that evoques the wild west, that emphasizes the go-anywhere nature of how an SUV should be used. Something like a wild animal, maybe something like a horse. I've got it! How about . . . Mustang! Oh, wait. They already did that, didn't they?
  • Slavuta There Used to be Pontiac Trans Sport.... That "Trans Sport" part has a totally new meaning these days
  • 210delray You need to change the headline -- it's a 2025 model.
  • Jeff How about Aspire for a new subcompact crossover from Ford because it aspires to be bigger and its buyers would aspire for a better vehicle if they could afford it.
  • Jeff Carlos Travares wants to cut costs by 1/3. I don't see Chrysler or Dodge surviving too much longer especially since they are being literally starved for product. The success of the new Charger could extend Dodge a few more years but a failure might be a quick end to Dodge. I could see Stellantis moving more manufacturing for Jeep and Ram to Mexico which I believe will eventually be the only surviving brands of the old Chrysler. As for the Durango if it continues it will not be for too many more years it is an outdated product that I doubt will be redesigned especially when Jeep has a comparable product. Stellantis needs to address the high dealer inventory level by giving better incentives and low interest rates to clear excessive inventory.
Next