GM's 6.2L V8 Fix Isn't Fixing It, and NHTSA Noticed

TTAC News Staff
by TTAC News Staff

The whole point of a recall is that the fix fixes it. GM's remedy for its troubled L87 6.2-liter V8 didn't get that memo. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened an Engineering Analysis into hundreds of engine failures that happened after dealers performed the recall work.

How we got here

The saga began with GM recalling nearly 600,000 L87 V8 engines after 28,000 of them suffered crankshaft, connecting rod, or engine bearing failures. This is the big V8 that powers some of GM's most popular models — the Chevy Silverado 1500, Suburban, and Tahoe, the GMC Sierra 1500 and Yukon, and the Cadillac Escalade. Under the recall, engines were inspected and either repaired or replaced.


The engines that passed inspection got respecified to run 0W-40 oil instead of the original 0W-20, along with a new oil filter, a new filler cap stamped with the 0W-40 spec, and an owner's manual update to match. The theory was that thicker oil would eliminate the risk of damage from manufacturing defects in the connecting rods and crankshafts. Case closed, problem solved, everyone drives happily into the sunset.


That's not how it went.


Nearly a million trucks under the microscope

NHTSA has since received reports of 499 additional engine failures that occurred after the recall work was done. Of those, 473 had been switched to the thicker oil, and 26 were replacement engines. Separately, GM logged 6,953 reports of post-recall engine failures — well over 10 percent of the recalled fleet. Numbers like that raise an obvious question about whether pouring in heavier oil ever actually addressed a manufacturing defect.


The NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation has now opened an Engineering Analysis to determine whether the recall worked at all, and it points to more evidence that it may not have. The 26 replacement engine failures are the most damning detail. The recall covered engines built between March 1, 2021, and May 31, 2024. The replacements were manufactured after that window and should not have failed in the same way, yet they did.


On top of that, there have been 191 reported failures of engines built after the original recall's 2024 cutoff. So the Engineering Analysis isn't limiting itself to the originally recalled units. It now sweeps through the 2026 model year, expanding the probe to 997,743 engines, per NHTSA.


What comes next

GM moves to a new 6.6-liter engine for the 2027 models, which conveniently sidesteps the L87 question going forward. Even so, having nearly a million engines under investigation is a rough look — for catastrophic failure and for a recall that may not have remedied anything.


Plenty of GM owners want the thicker oil spec applied to the new V8s, on the logic that heavier oil was supposed to be the whole fix for the L87. Whether that holds up remains to be seen, given that the fix hasn't held up so far.


There's no new recall prescribing an additional remedy yet. But one may be coming: an Engineering Analysis is typically NHTSA's final step before ordering exactly that.


This article was written using AI and was then edited and optimized by our editorial team.


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first bysubscribing to our newsletter.


TTAC News Staff
TTAC News Staff

More by TTAC News Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 29 comments
  • Mattwc1 Mattwc1 on Aug 28, 2026

    Full size trucks are the cash cows for the big three. How in the world did GM let this happen? Yes, they will still sell a lot of truck but I do expect a lot of burned buyers to go elsewhere for their next vehicle.

    • InCogKneeToe InCogKneeToe on Aug 31, 2026

      GM was so set on 100% EV by 2035 that they forgot that 2035 is 10 years away. That they have to sell ICE until then and that ICE's would pay the bill of the switch over.


  • Mde138659062 Mde138659062 on Sep 17, 2026

    The Biden push for better mileage is one of the reasons for the failures. Also, if you idle a Hemi for long periods it'll break too.


    • E**169275769 E**169275769 on Sep 17, 2026

      Those are junk motors .BTW they are not hemis as they were in the old days , that’s simply a name not a description 👎👎👎👎.They are just a regular pent roof combustion chamber motor like the junk gm V8’s that are failing .Whst fool would buy a gm truck today .They are just even if this motor problem didn’t happen.But it did , they knew about it and lied to people like my neighbor who recently bought a new escalade and didn’t even have 300 miles on it when he brought it in , two days after buying it , for bad engine noise.They told him an oil change with a higher viscosity oil would fix the problem .They did it , the engine failed the next day on the freeway with his wife and two very young children in it and it was 100degrees .He told them he wanted his money back and after some discussion , that wasn’t going well they gave in and gave him his money back .He bought a new “Black Edition(?) , Navigator and love it .I quit buying anything gm when obama bailed them out .


  • The Ayatollah of Rock n Rolla If the new REO actually happens, and it happens roughly where their target price sits, but at least below $30k, I think that is a great inexpensive truck that would solve the truck needs of the vast majority of current truck buyers.As for cars...we need CARS. Not stupid SUVs. Not ugly crossover blobs. CARS. Coupes, sedans, wagons. Start building something midsized, and make the price point in the mid 30s or lower. AWD optional. And yes, I know Toyota, Honda, and Hyundai/Kia still make sedans. But GM, Ford, and Chrysler/Stellantis need to get on the ball and bring out some competition.
  • 3-On-The-Tree My C6 with the LS3 got over 30 mpg on the highway in 6th gear on cruise control doing 80-85.
  • KwikShiftPro4X On Kijiji this would be $3000 as-is, where-is. Vintage! Rare! I knows whats I got!
  • SCE to AUX KBB says that the ATP of new vehicles was $50,526 in September. As a group, buyers afforded that much, but we know that some (up to 6%) will default. Deducting 6% from that ATP, we get $47,494.So anything lower than that is 'more affordable', and anything higher than that is 'less affordable'.
  • Tom170698702 It's time to stop recycling old articles. This one is almost 3 months old.
Next