UAW Predictably Endorses Biden for President

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

With very little going on in the automotive realm amid the pandemic, we decided to check in on the United Auto Workers to see if another chapter had been added to the organization’s ongoing corruption scandal. Not much news on that front, though the union did announce its pick for presidential candidate. On Tuesday, it publicly embraced Joe Biden.

While Biden has long been the presumed UAW favorite, a March confrontation with a Detroit factory worker over the former vice president’s 2nd Amendment policies briefly resulted in a cadre of union members pushing back against the candidate over social media. At the time, the situation looked to have done real damage to his prospects of getting union endorsements in the Midwest. However, it seems the outrage was short-lived. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has taken great strides to appeal to factory workers living in states like Michigan and Ohio — measures that clearly helped get him elected in 2016.

Recall the UAW came out rather aggressively against Trump prior to the last election and ultimately endorsed Hilary Clinton. With that in mind, it would be almost unthinkable to see the union change course. It was probably always going to be Biden; the union just needed to make an the obligatory announcement.

“In these dangerous and difficult times, the country needs a president who will demonstrate clear, stable leadership, less partisan acrimony and more balance to the rights and protections of working Americans,” said UAW President Rory Gamble in a statement.

“UAW Members need a federal government that ensures that members have both a good job to go to, and that they come home to their families at night having earned a fair day’s wage in a safe and secure place.”

While we’re inclined to agree with Gamble’s sentiment, the UAW’s endorsement record is about as partisan as it gets. In 2016, the The Detroit News asked an official from the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL–CIO) if it or the UAW had ever endorsed a Republican presidential nominee. They responded with a negative, while a UAW spokesperson said they couldn’t be certain. A little research tells us the AFL–CIO actually failed to endorse George McGovern in 1972. But the UAW did — along with every proceeding Democrat frontrunner until today.

It makes sense, as left-leaning candidates tend to be seen as more union friendly than their right-leaning counterparts. The UAW said Biden has already offered a clear strategy for union employees, which includes the following:

Reign in the abuse of corporate power over working people and hold corporate executives personally accountable for violations of labor laws.

Encourage and incentivize unionization and collective bargaining; and [sic]

Ensure that workers are treated with dignity and receive the pay, benefits and workplace protections they deserve.

Ensure we expand access to affordable quality health care.

By contrast, the union’s previous messaging about Trump suggested he was interested in lowering wages or moving auto sector jobs out of the Midwest and into states with less union influence.

“With the comment he made here in Detroit, it leads one to believe that the way to bring jobs back is to lower everybody’s wages. One of the biggest issues in the U.S. today is inequality in wages. I have met people who work two jobs in order to make ends meet, working 60, 70, 80, 90 hours a week. In our society that’s what’s going on. So what are the details of making America great? I don’t want a president who has a good line. I want a president who has a line with the details. I want a president that will tell us what the details are. Trump has avoided the details. That concerns me,” former UAW President Dennis Williams wrote in 2016 after the union endorsed Clinton.

Williams is currently tied to the broadening corruption probe targeting UAW officials who embezzled funds (and/or took bribes) to pay for extravagant vacations, parties, and sprucing up their homes. While no charges has been filed against Mr. Williams, he’s believed to be one of the anonymous officials listed in the courtroom documents — specifically “UAW Official B,” who is alleged to have used ill-gotten cash to pay for rental properties around the country. But this is a new election, with Gamble now heading the union.

Will members heed the UAW’s quadrennial call to unify around its preferred candidate or has too much goodwill been lost? Hard to say, but a decidedly unscientific survey conducted by yours truly over several bored coronavirus weekends saw a smattering of UAW members endorsing Trump and Biden on an even split. That sample size of eight is bound to have a sizable margin of error, however.

Speaking of unscientific, Gamble also said that the UAW has been negotiating for enhanced safety standards over COVID-19 return-to-work policies — adding that the issue “demonstrates the need for Presidential leadership to follow the guidance of science and give workers a seat in discussions over their safety and well-being.”

Likewise, the UAW estimated that Biden’s experience in the past administration’s involvement in the “successful auto recovery will be instrumental as the industry experiences massive changes in technology and jobs,” be they in the automotive sector or elsewhere.

“In a changing economic environment, we need steady leadership and planning to make sure the jobs of the future are good-paying union jobs with benefits,” concluded Gamble. “And UAW members need to know they have a voice in those changes … UAW members ultimately want a voice. And Joe Biden is committed to giving UAW members that voice at the table.”

[Image: UAW]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 203 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Apr 22, 2020

    Regarding my previous Biden comment - it was a joke. Why you guys are taking everything so seriously to the point of starting civil war. For Biden? I have a suggestion for you: put your money where your mouth is and start buying UAW made vehicles if you are so affectionate about Biden and his son.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Apr 23, 2020

    This article is click bait. I wish this article was not posted because this encourages more partisan attacks instead of car discussions. Unfortunately the COVID-19 has encouraged nightly political campaigning by our President and I would be saying this even if he was a Democrat. Let's get back to more articles about cars.

    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Apr 23, 2020

      @Jeff S - true but media outlets are competing for clicks which in turn affect revenue generation. COVID-19 is the dominant topic on people's minds. A distraction from that would be nice.

  • Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Next