Breaking Up Isn't Hard to Do: Fiat Chrysler Announces Parts Division Spin-off

by Steph Willems

Published: April 5th, 2018

breaking up em isn t em hard to do fiat chrysler announces parts division

As Magneti Marelli prepares for its 100th birthday next year, the Italian parts supplier can expect to mark the occasion while newly single.

In a bid to streamline its operations, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has announced it is moving forward with a plan to spin off the weighty subsidiary. The split should be complete by the end of this year or early next.

Magneti Marelli manufactures numerous automotive components, from lighting to powertrain parts to electronics, and employs roughly 43,000 workers in 19 countries. Dozens of manufacturing plants exist under its umbrella. Started as a joint venture between Fiat and Ercole Marelli in 1919, the company officially became a Fiat subsidiary in 1967.

According to Reuters, analysts estimate the division’s net worth at between 4.4 and 6.1 billion dollars.

Early Thursday, FCA issued a statement saying its board of directors had “authorized FCA management to develop and implement a plan to separate the Magneti Marelli business from FCA and to distribute shares of a new holding company for Magneti Marelli to the shareholders of FCA.” The company’s shares will be listen on the Milan stock exchange.

FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne stated that spinning off the division will “deliver value” to FCA shareholders and put Magneti Marelli in a position for growth. “The spin-off will also allow FCA to further focus on its core portfolio while at the same time improving its capital position,” he said.

The parts business was just one of the pieces of the FCA pie rumored to separate from the flock last year. Alfa Romeo and Maserati were included in this list, but Marchionne squashed murmurs of the brands’ impending spin-off. The same rumors circulated around Jeep after reports emerged Chinese automakers expressing interest in acquiring the brand. Jeep, Marchionne said, is not for sale.

FCA remains on a fairly aggressive debt-cutting spree, with the automaker hoping to finish the year in the black.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

#Fca #FiatChryslerAutomobiles #MagnetiMarelli #Spinoffs #Suppliers

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 4 comments

Ect on Apr 05, 2018

"automaker hoping to finish the year in the black." Huh? FCA has been and is in the black. 2017 net profit, for example, was €5 billion.

Like Reply
Ohioeric on Apr 07, 2018

Didn't work out so well for Delphi from GM or Visteon from Ford. Third time is a charm? I doubt it.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Forward Observer Tesla cash on hand is $45 billion. That is a large mattress.Ford Motor Company market cap is $46 billion. Wait, forget I said that.
Pianoboy57 I would never buy this even if i had the money. What makes it so special? Limited Edition? That doesn't mean anything at the BHPH lot.
6.2deadlifters Because of the current administration no cheap car can exist. US worker SalariesUS sourced materials with costs from US salaries aquiring materials.US UnionsUS corporationsTARIFFS against trade partnersAll these things prevent a 'good' 'reliable' 20,000$ 4-door 4-passanger car capable of 4-start offset and side impact crash protection.Game-Set-Match, end of line. No possible outcome. No discussion possible. every american loses.
Forward Observer The last time I had a door off my truck I hung it from my Little Giant ladder. But I was only replacing the hinge pins.I'm sorry if this sounds smarmy or smug, I am working on my people skills. (My therapist says I have a long way to go to catch up with some of you.) Would smarmy and smug come in handy if I worked for an automotive dealership? (I wonder.)
Arthur Dailey Auto 'journalists' should stop referencing the average new car purchase price and instead report on the mean price. We all understand that the glue of luxury vehicles and full size pickups inflate the average price.For me, 'affordable' hovers around the $35k mark.Under current N.A. standards, hatchbacks, stations wagons and non-luxury coupes are basically a lost cause.Personally I would like to see Canada convert to accepting vehicles that have passed the European standards, rather than adhering only to N.A. standards. That would allow for the importation of vehicles such as Dacias, Skodas, and yes more Fiats. Also some models for Japanese and Korean manufacturers that currently are not sold in North America. It may even help Mitsubishi in the Canadian market and allow for the return of Suzuki. Having more small, affordable vehicles available is not a bad thing.