More Korean Crossovers? Ssangyong Isn't Giving Up on the United States

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Hyundai and Kia did it, so why not Ssangyong? The India-owned Korean automaker has been itching to expand its horizons for years, but tentative plans to invade the Chinese car market have fallen victim to bad timing and geopolitics. Now, the company’s board is weighing a U.S. entry.

It’s not the first time Ssangyong Motor, owned by Mahindra & Mahindra, has eyed the United States for a big volume boost. Early last year, the automaker and its parent company temporarily shelved a proposed 2019 U.S. expansion plan, with Ssangyong’s CEO warning it could “make or break” the company.

Well, the idea’s back. With Ssangyong eager to land on American shores by 2020, a new report says the company has already made its decision.

The only problem is, we don’t yet know if it’s a green light or a thumbs-down. According to Wards Auto, Ssangyong’s board of directors met in Seoul on October 26th to vote on the automaker’s plan.

“As of now, we cannot confirm it,” a spokesman told WardsAuto following the meeting. “There may be some news coming out, but not today.”

Even if the board votes it down this time, it might not do the same in February. Mahindra Group managing director (and Ssangyong board chair) Pawan Goenka says the automaker will re-submit the plan at the next possible opportunity if it fails this time.

“We certainly need to develop two or three good markets for SsangYong outside Korea. China is one such possible market, but not the only possible market,” Goenka told The Korea Herald on the 25th.

“We are working on the possibility of (a U.S. entry in) 2020. The board of SsangYong will be deciding either tomorrow (Thursday), or the February meeting to give an approval for the investment for the U.S. And once the board gives the approval, then after that it is going to take about three or 3 1/2 years to enter the U.S.”

Mahindra’s 72-percent stake in Ssangyong means the automaker’s enthusiasm for expansion is tempered by its parent’s control of the purse strings. Last year, Ssangyong CEO Choi Johng-sik told Reuters, “It is true that there are many concerns about the U.S. entry.”

Mahindra wanted to focus on China first, but South Korea’s defensive missile battery — set up to ward off the nuclear threat from the North — has placed relations with China on edge. Production was supposed to start in that country in 2019 via a joint venture with Shaanxi Automobile Group. That plan is now kaput. With China no longer a friendly market for Korean cars, Ssangyong’s gaze has once again turned eastward.

What type of vehicle would Ssangyong launch as its inaugural U.S. product? Assuming Mahindra and Ssangyong’s board approves of the move, it’s looking like an electric SUV (already in the works for 2020) will be that vehicle. Ssangyong also debuted a very fleshed-out SIV-2 hybrid crossover concept at last year’s Geneva Motor Show that should reach production sometime in 2018. The company also builds the existing Tivoli SUV.

The jury’s out on whether America will quickly adopt the electrified lifestyle once the right kind of vehicles (with the right kind of range) appear, but Ssangyong’s SUV-heavy lineup does seem like a natural fit for the U.S. marketplace. Stay tuned.

[Image: Ssangyong Motor]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • El scotto El scotto on Oct 27, 2017

    Oh My Lord! An electric/hybrid crossover from an Indian owned, Korean built company. There will be lines around the block! Mahindra needs to re-examine their small truck plans. But hey, we'll get some of the sweet; sweet vehicles the Aussies do!

  • Mmreeses Mmreeses on Oct 27, 2017

    in addition to everything said above... Stuff gets lost in translation/transliteration from West to East and vice-versa. Ssangyong literally means "double/twin/two dragons" if i recall correctly. Two "s" mean it's an extra "s" sound if that makes any sense. Rebrand the name as Mahindra or Dragon Motors or Tivoli. Ssangyong already has a lot of hill to climb outside of Korea, no point in footing itself in the foot with a name that gives Western speakers a double take. Like Kumho tires. ;)

  • Forward Observer Tesla cash on hand is $45 billion. That is a large mattress.Ford Motor Company market cap is $46 billion. Wait, forget I said that.
  • Pianoboy57 I would never buy this even if i had the money. What makes it so special? Limited Edition? That doesn't mean anything at the BHPH lot.
  • 6.2deadlifters Because of the current administration no cheap car can exist. US worker SalariesUS sourced materials with costs from US salaries aquiring materials.US UnionsUS corporationsTARIFFS against trade partnersAll these things prevent a 'good' 'reliable' 20,000$ 4-door 4-passanger car capable of 4-start offset and side impact crash protection.Game-Set-Match, end of line. No possible outcome. No discussion possible. every american loses.
  • Forward Observer The last time I had a door off my truck I hung it from my Little Giant ladder. But I was only replacing the hinge pins.I'm sorry if this sounds smarmy or smug, I am working on my people skills. (My therapist says I have a long way to go to catch up with some of you.) Would smarmy and smug come in handy if I worked for an automotive dealership? (I wonder.)
  • Arthur Dailey Auto 'journalists' should stop referencing the average new car purchase price and instead report on the mean price. We all understand that the glue of luxury vehicles and full size pickups inflate the average price.For me, 'affordable' hovers around the $35k mark.Under current N.A. standards, hatchbacks, stations wagons and non-luxury coupes are basically a lost cause.Personally I would like to see Canada convert to accepting vehicles that have passed the European standards, rather than adhering only to N.A. standards. That would allow for the importation of vehicles such as Dacias, Skodas, and yes more Fiats. Also some models for Japanese and Korean manufacturers that currently are not sold in North America. It may even help Mitsubishi in the Canadian market and allow for the return of Suzuki. Having more small, affordable vehicles available is not a bad thing.
Next