Huawei Asks Mercedes, Audi to Collab on Software

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Chinese smartphone giant Huawei has apparently broached the topic of software collaboration with a pair of German automotive companies. According to reports, Huawei wants to bust out of the situation in which it finds itself partnered on such projects solely with brands in China.


Per Reuters, the company – notably the target of American sanctions for the last five years or so – has held preliminary talks with Merc in an effort to place them at the helm of somewhere between 3 and 5 percent of Huawei’s Intelligent Automotive Solution (IAS) business unit. Talking heads value the joint at around $30 billion, making even a five percent stake worth over a billion dollars. Ze Germans seemed to have rebuffed the offer, citing a desire to remain in charge of its own software destiny instead of sloughing it off to a supplier.


Audi’s involvement is less clear, though it is worth noting there are rumblings of them and Huawei planning a partnership to develop new autonomous driving aids. However, anything which springs forth from that joint venture will apparently be installed only on Audi models sold in the Chinese market, where the company is tangled up with the FAW Group home team. Remember, the latter is a state-owned automobile manufacturer in a market where outside companies must forge some sort of partnership with a local outfit in order to get off the ground – at least in terms of car. GM is partnered with a group called SAIC for the same reason. Audi currently makes 9 different models in China, ranging from the A3 and Q2L to the A6L and e-tron.


Predictably, everyone involved has clammed up and there are precisely no official statements from either Merc or Audi – or Huawei, for that matter – about this potential collab. What's you take? Should car companies shack up with tech giants in order to produce legible infotainment systems and the like? Or should they go it alone?


[Image: Huawei]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 15 comments
  • IBx1 IBx1 on Dec 12, 2023

    Give me a DIN format radio I can rip out without affecting HVAC controls or the trip meter.

    • See 1 previous
    • Art_Vandelay Art_Vandelay on Dec 12, 2023

      You can complain all you want, but that ship has sailed. screens are the thing now. best you can hope for is a good UI


  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Dec 12, 2023

    Speaking of software, why does the first reply to a comment get hidden a lot of the time? It makes it look like people are talking to themselves (which some of us are lol).

    The Truth About Comments 🙂

  • SCE to AUX It's a trainwreck, Norfolk Southern style.
  • Arthur Dailey An uncle of mine purchases a 2nd generation Accord sedan. At the time, at least in Canada the hatchback Accord was seen more often than the sedan. After driving it, I became a huge fan. At the time my wife and I were both driving Civics. When I could afford to, we purchased a brand new 1986 (3rd generation) Accord sedan. That is still my wife's all time favourite vehicle of the many that we have had.The only issue we ever had was with the A/C which despite our ordering the car, was a dealer installed option, as was the norm with Hondas in Canada at that time. I eventually sold it to a co-worker. Who then sold it to one of his family members. 15 years later it was still 'going strong'. My uncle came into some money and replaced his Accord with a brand new Jaguar sedan. He had a love/hate relationship with the Jaguar. Loved it when it ran properly. Hated it ever time there was an issue, or he had to pay for maintenance/repairs/parts for it.
  • Buickman some stores may have still had some carbon paper on hand?
  • Zerofoo I would rather that car companies put the correct engine in the car to start. The "base" engine is almost always there for rental car fodder. Simplifying drivetrains would go a long way to reducing costs. If you want a smaller engine, buy a smaller car. The trend of putting small highly-stressed engines in big cars sucks. Hybrid drivetrains are even worse - complex, heavy, and certain to cause future high repair bills. All for a few MPG. Finally, to hell with CAFE standards. Just divide the fines among all the units you sell and get some lobbyists to get rid of the standards the Federal Government has no constitutional right to set anyway.
  • Master Baiter But, is the EX30 as glitchy as Joe Biden on a debate stage?
Next