Extended Warranty Company CarChex Facing Huge FTC Settlement for Deceptive Practices

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Some extended auto warranty and service contract providers have earned a bad rap over the years for deceptive business practices and harassing potential customers. One of the most well-known names in the industry is now facing a significant fine for its deeds. CarShield has agreed to pay $10 million to the Federal Trade Commission over claims that it deceived customers with its advertising.


The FTC’s director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection said, “Instead of delivering the ‘peace of mind’ promised by its advertisements, CarShield left many consumers with a financial headache. Worse still, CarShield used trusted personalities to deliver its empty promises. The FTC will hold advertisers accountable for using false or deceptive claims to exploit consumers’ financial anxieties.”


Part of the complaint relates to CarShield’s use of Ice-T and Allen Iverson to endorse its products. The FTC said that the company failed to cover the repairs stated in those advertisements and noted that customers were often told they couldn’t get repairs at their chosen shops or get a loaner vehicle. In many cases, customers had to pay thousands for repairs that they were told would be covered.

In addition to the settlement, CarShield is subject to a few restrictions:

  • It cannot use deceptive or misleading statements
  • It cannot violate the FTC’s telemarketing rules
  • It must ensure the people it hires to endorse the products are truthful and accurate


Back in 2021, I used CarChex to cover a 200,000-mile Porsche Cayenne GTS, which almost immediately needed repairs that cost more than I paid. This story is a familiar one for me, because CarChex failed to cover the entirety of a repair that was detailed in my contract. While I didn’t see a reason to sue or pursue other actions, this story and my experience led me to believe these practices are more widespread than anyone knows, even for the most well-known brands.


[Images: AvokadoStudio, tuaindeed via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 33 comments
  • Tedward Tedward on Aug 04, 2024
    I asked an f&I about this and they said that warranty co behavior depends on the cars factory warranty status at purchase. So the customer buying a cpo car with some original bumper to bumper left will basically have those terms extended and have claims honored. Whereas out of initial warranty purchasers get to enjoy shady fine print exceptions and frequently denied claims. I bet this has far more to do with keeping f&I people happy at major dealerships than on the underwriting.
    • FreedMike FreedMike on Aug 05, 2024
      Not to put too fine a point on it, but are you really going to believe a F&I guy? Wouldn't be my first choice.
  • Tedward Tedward on Aug 05, 2024
    Well yeah, or at least because I wasn't buying a car. That's their sales channel after all. It was a lady actually, and she also said it was her problem when something didn't get covered. That's her hopefully repeat customer getting pissed off. This also wasn't in a major metro area.
  • Namesakeone It should be a name that evoques the wild west, that emphasizes the go-anywhere nature of how an SUV should be used. Something like a wild animal, maybe something like a horse. I've got it! How about . . . Mustang! Oh, wait. They already did that, didn't they?
  • Slavuta There Used to be Pontiac Trans Sport.... That "Trans Sport" part has a totally new meaning these days
  • 210delray You need to change the headline -- it's a 2025 model.
  • Jeff How about Aspire for a new subcompact crossover from Ford because it aspires to be bigger and its buyers would aspire for a better vehicle if they could afford it.
  • Jeff Carlos Travares wants to cut costs by 1/3. I don't see Chrysler or Dodge surviving too much longer especially since they are being literally starved for product. The success of the new Charger could extend Dodge a few more years but a failure might be a quick end to Dodge. I could see Stellantis moving more manufacturing for Jeep and Ram to Mexico which I believe will eventually be the only surviving brands of the old Chrysler. As for the Durango if it continues it will not be for too many more years it is an outdated product that I doubt will be redesigned especially when Jeep has a comparable product. Stellantis needs to address the high dealer inventory level by giving better incentives and low interest rates to clear excessive inventory.
Next