Extended Warranty Company CarChex Facing Huge FTC Settlement for Deceptive Practices
Some extended auto warranty and service contract providers have earned a bad rap over the years for deceptive business practices and harassing potential customers. One of the most well-known names in the industry is now facing a significant fine for its deeds. CarShield has agreed to pay $10 million to the Federal Trade Commission over claims that it deceived customers with its advertising.
The FTC’s director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection said, “Instead of delivering the ‘peace of mind’ promised by its advertisements, CarShield left many consumers with a financial headache. Worse still, CarShield used trusted personalities to deliver its empty promises. The FTC will hold advertisers accountable for using false or deceptive claims to exploit consumers’ financial anxieties.”
Part of the complaint relates to CarShield’s use of Ice-T and Allen Iverson to endorse its products. The FTC said that the company failed to cover the repairs stated in those advertisements and noted that customers were often told they couldn’t get repairs at their chosen shops or get a loaner vehicle. In many cases, customers had to pay thousands for repairs that they were told would be covered.
In addition to the settlement, CarShield is subject to a few restrictions:
- It cannot use deceptive or misleading statements
- It cannot violate the FTC’s telemarketing rules
- It must ensure the people it hires to endorse the products are truthful and accurate
Back in 2021, I used CarChex to cover a 200,000-mile Porsche Cayenne GTS, which almost immediately needed repairs that cost more than I paid. This story is a familiar one for me, because CarChex failed to cover the entirety of a repair that was detailed in my contract. While I didn’t see a reason to sue or pursue other actions, this story and my experience led me to believe these practices are more widespread than anyone knows, even for the most well-known brands.
[Images: AvokadoStudio, tuaindeed via Shutterstock]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.
More by Chris Teague
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Lorenzo If it's over 30 years old and over 80k miles, and not a classic, it's a parts car, worth no more than 20% of original price.
- Dusterdude No mileage noted on a 33 year old car means likely well north of 300k + miles , along with issues noted , should equate to an ask price of less than $3k
- Ajla IMO, something like this really should be naturally-aspirated.
- Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh Unless they are solid state batteries you BAN THEM. I like EVs... but EVs like to burn ... for days
- Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh uh .. it looks like a VW golf got the mumps
Comments
Join the conversation