Opinion: Tesla Needs to Behave Better

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Lost a bit in the holiday rush here at TTAC was a new Reuters story about Tesla blaming the buyers of its cars for parts failures.


It's a long, thoroughly investigated piece and I am still working through it. We didn't cover it due to our small staff and the holiday blur -- we almost certainly have hit it any other week. But from what I've seen so far, Tesla has a lot of explaining to do.

I could write a screed like this just about every week -- it seems like we're constantly hearing about Tesla or one of Elon Musk's other companies cutting corners when it comes to safety, presumably in order to keep the stock price juiced. Indeed, the Reuters piece references safety problems at SpaceX.

In this case, Tesla is accused of blaming customers for abusing vehicles even though the company knew its parts had flaws.

In other words, the company is being accused with knowing that its parts were either poorly designed or defective, and instead of taking responsibility, it blamed customers and claimed the customers did the damage via "abuse."

We at TTAC, myself especially, have been accused as Tesla and/or Musk haters. I can assure you I have no anti-Tesla or anti-Musk bias. That said, this kind of stuff makes my blood boil. I do have a bias against companies that ignore safety concerns and then try to blame their customers -- putting the customers both at a safety risk and on the hook financially for expensive repairs that should be covered under warranty. I would say the same about Ford or GM or Toyota or Honda or Kia -- had I been working here during the GM ignition switch recall, ho boy.

OK, preventative defense against accusations of bias aside, back to Tesla. Internal documents seem to show that the company knew about defects and kept both consumers and safety regulators in the dark.

It's also worth noting here that Tesla, unlike other automakers, doesn't use an independent dealer network to sell or service its cars. That matters because, in theory, Tesla would know about defects and warranty claims more quickly than other automakers. Having worked in the dealer world, admittedly over 15 years ago, I can say this is probably true. Legacy automakers do have representatives that check in with dealers and monitor claims to spot trends, to be clear, and these folks would likely notice company-wide problems pretty quickly, but it would presumably happen even faster if the service centers were owned and managed by the automaker.

It's clear that assuming the Reuters report is accurate -- and there is no reason to doubt it is -- Tesla decided to blame customers for its failures. It did so for several reasons: To reduce warranty costs, to avoid having its stock price punished by investors over concerns about reliability, and so it could tout its cars as being worth buying.

If that's the case, and it appears to be, the company should be punished harshly.

It's not just a moral issue -- it's a safety issue. The company's inability to take accountability and say, recall the cars with potential defects, puts its drivers and the other drivers around them at risk.

Not to say that Tesla is the ONLY automaker that has engaged in these kinds of shenanigans -- I am sure that if I went back through history, I'd find plenty of examples of legacy automakers pulling stuff like this. This is why the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has the authority to force recalls, at least when safety is involved.

So I am not picking on Tesla just because the company is the new kid on the block or out of any animosity towards Musk. I am picking on Tesla because it appears that instead of doing the right thing and fixing its cars' defects, at great cost both financially and to its reputation, it chose to blame its customers for its failures. That's enraging and frightening.

If I had just bought a brand-new Tesla and the suspension fell off within the first 200 miles, and then Tesla tried to deny the warranty claim and said I "abused" the vehicle, I'd be livid. I'd be Sam Jackson scraping brains off the Chevy Malibu seats in Pulp Fiction -- a mushroom-cloud laying mother bleeper.

In fact, I don't even own a Tesla and I am getting proper mad. I am tired of companies skating away from their responsibilities towards their customers (and since Teslas are driven on public roads, the rest of us as well). Tesla needs to stop this behavior. It needs to be willing to pay warranty claims when defects are clearly its fault. It needs to fix its designs if parts are breaking and causing unsafe situations.

Take your medicine, Elon. Fix what's wrong. And don't blame others for your failings.

[Image: Tesla]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 58 comments
  • FreedMike FreedMike on Dec 30, 2023

    An ex of mine had a great saying - "your best quality is usually your worst quality." And it's true of companies as well. Tesla shoots from the hip, which has worked spectacularly for them at solving problems on the fly, but they also clearly shoot from the hip when it comes to customer relations decisions (like blaming customers for clear-cut engineering or quality issues).


    If there's any good news here, it's that Tesla a) isn't bereft of competition anymore, so bad news like this will force change, and b) they can fix things quickly. We'll see how they handle it, but I'd be surprised if they don't change this practice very, very soon. These guys are anything but dumb.

    • Alan Alan on Dec 31, 2023

      FreedMike, many businesses appear to be managed by people who think they are system engineers. System engineers are the enemy of real engineers. Most system engineers I encounter over promise and rarely seek good advice, ie, corporate knowledge and real system knowledge (from subject matter experts). They live by "what ifs" and "ifs". So, if this occurs then we can do that and most of their work has to be repaired on the go and eventually the final outcome is little like the system engineers original design. Look at most anything Tesla and Musk does, the final product is not like the initial idea. So, whatever Musk states appears as BS.


  • Sayahh Sayahh on Dec 31, 2023

    Typo? "It's clear that assuming the Reuters report is accurate -- and there is no reason to doubt it is -- Tesla decided to blame customers for its failures. It did so for several reasons..."


    Did you mean to write "there is no reason to doubt it ISN'T"?



    Also, unlike CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, Rolling Stone, the New York Times and others that have a left-leaning bias, IMO, the AP and Reuters are some of the least biased news wire sources in the world. A violation or even appearance of a conflict of interest has gotten reporters dismissed from the wire service. NY Post uses them, Washington Examiner uses them, Fox News and their website uses them, and many more. If every criticism is invalid and undeserved, then perhaps it isn't the reporting that is the issue. First Honda and Cummings and now Toyota and Daihatsu all have been discovered to have falsified data out of greed or pressure, and they are being blasted accordingly. Are there bound to be faulty parts when you make millions of them? Sure. Are there bound to be bad actors who drive them into stuff they shouldn't have? More likely than not. But when there are actual, frequent and widespread problems happening to different ppl of different ages, income levels, driving proficiencies ending with problems with parts and warranty process, it doesn't hurt to ask questions and start investigations. Toyota had the old burning engines that didn't have enough drain holes and bad piston rings, some model years did end up getting recalled or fixed, but others were SOL and basically told to pound sand. Also, GM, Ford, Toyota, Hyundai and others have all been found to have painted cars poorly or with shoddy paint and/or process or not enough coats that caused bubbling, peeling, delaminating, etc. And customers call them out for it, even if regulators never get involved or order a recall or repaint. Nobody's perfect, but much like increasing the purchase price of earlier models that ticked off wealthy buyers, he's still making promises he cannot keep and shrugging off criticisms he doesn't like. Is the CEO of WB making bad decisions? Woke or not, a bad money-losing decision is a money-losing decision, and if it makes money, it makes money. Aquaman 2? Didn't do so well. Barbie? It broke records. The MCU? It did well before the Avengers Endgame but lately, not so much. Calling companies and CEOs out when they put out a bad product is fair game--and even necessary--as long as everyone who makes mistakes gets called out, UAW or not UAW, built in Fremont, China or Germany.

    • See 3 previous
    • Sayahh Sayahh on Jan 03, 2024

      @M B: I'd need to see a link to see context in which it was used. They might or might not have used it to let their readers know that it is also colloquially known that the other name, much like how the Affordable Care Act isn't really Obamacare when Obama isn't a doctor nor an insurance company, and the 1998 Copyright Term Extension Act, also known as the Mickey Mouse Protection Act, which isn't its real name but is essentially what it did and who was behind the lobbying efforts.


  • Lorenzo If it's over 30 years old and over 80k miles, and not a classic, it's a parts car, worth no more than 20% of original price.
  • Dusterdude No mileage noted on a 33 year old car means likely well north of 300k + miles , along with issues noted , should equate to an ask price of less than $3k
  • Ajla IMO, something like this really should be naturally-aspirated.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh Unless they are solid state batteries you BAN THEM. I like EVs... but EVs like to burn ... for days
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh uh .. it looks like a VW golf got the mumps
Next