Is the Toyota Prius C Better Left in Japan?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While the Toyota Prius was an inarguable success on the North American market, its smaller sibling really only had a few good years before sales figures started trending in the wrong direction. The Prius C attempted to court urbanites (the C stands for city) by offering the same hybrid concept in a smaller package. Unfortunately, Toyota only managed to move around 13,000 between the United States and Canada in 2017 before its discontinuation the following year — leaving us with the standard Prius and the tongue-twisting Prius Prime Plug-in Hybrid.

But the C has since been revised in its native Japan, where it’s called the Aqua, resulting in a slightly roomier automobile with a new high-output bipolar nickel-hydrogen battery that’s supposed to deliver improved responsiveness and range. Considering the escalation of Western fuel prices, we’re wondering if it’s time for the Prius C to make a comeback in our neck of the woods or if it’s better left to cruise around the tight streets of Tokyo where its success is all but assured as the Aqua.

Toyota is attempting to think long-term with this one and deliver a vehicle that can satisfy economically minded consumers for the next decade. That involved making the Aqua a 2.0-inch longer wheelbase (via the TNGA-B platform) that’s primary goal was creating more interior volume for rear passengers and cargo. Considering the old model couldn’t even store 20 cubic feet of junk without folding down the seats, nixing rear passengers to accommodate for 70 cubic feet, this is likely to be a major win for the model.

But the most important aspect has to be the powertrain and clearly where Toyota put most of its effort. The entire package has been shrunk down using “bipolar electrodes” that effectively allow the cells to be stacked like sardines. This results in a smaller, tightly packed battery that weighs less and can have a charged sent straight through the stack. It also means Toyota could cram in more cells overall.

The manufacturer says this has resulted in a vehicle with 1.5 times the power output of its predecessor, while the use of NiMH batteries allows for more predictable performance in colder climates. Toyota has been one of the few companies that have spoken about battery technologies in a manner I would consider serious, at least when pressed, and has prided itself on advancing hybrid technology since the beginning. Cold-weather performance has been something its engineers have been going on about for years.

While this is less important in a hybrid than an EV, it still makes a difference in overall performance. Toyota is promising the 1.5-liter “Dynamic Force Engine” and an optimized HEV system is capable of returning 35.8 km/L (which translates into an insane 84 mpg) on the more basic model. Though the figure is likely inflated a bit by the nature of Toyota using the WLTC test cycle. The United States’ EPA assessment would undoubtedly yield smaller numbers.

It’s still wildly impressive and shouldn’t come down by much on better equipped Aqua models, which have tried to add more comfort, quietness, and practicality. While packaging would be different for North America, Toyota is adding larger displays, improved interior storage solutions, and an “emergency power supply mode” that effectively turns the car into a generator for pretty much whatever customers need during a blackout or camping trip.

Toyota is also promising more power and smoother acceleration (figures TBA), with the ability to accommodate single-pedal driving. While this is a feature we’ve seen cropping up on EVs, your author has mixed feelings on its true utility. Upping the regenerative qualities of the car is nice and extends the overall range. But the single-pedal mode can also make the vehicle feel like a combustion car that’s stuck in low gear if it’s not done well.

Though that ultimately has no impact on my trying to decide if bringing back the Prius C is a move Toyota should be making. While we already have the Corolla Hybrid, it’s locked into a mid-tier trim and is only about a grand cheaper than the base $24,525 Prius. The Aqua is offering substantially better-claimed efficiencies in a smaller and likely cheaper package (it starts in Japan for under $18,000), making us wonder if it’s time for the Prius C to make a comeback as fuel prices climb and the American economy develops a thousand-yard stare.

[Images: Toyota]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 61 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Jul 23, 2021

    I thought the Prius V was a good idea, but I don't know whether they sold many. I used to see them fairly often, but haven't seen one in a while.

  • Airfidget Airfidget on Jul 23, 2021

    I think everyone in the US would choose the corolla hybrid over the prius C. Key differences that I see are 2.0 liter 4 versus 1.5 liter 3 cylinder, and the battery. Let them have the new battery technology in Japan for a few years, get the bugs worked out, then send it over here. I'm fine with that. And I don't think an american is going to go for a 3 cylinder any time soon, unless they don't advertise it. Only bonus to bring it over earlier,the Japanese website says 33.8 / 36 kilometer/liter. 79 to 86 mpg. That's nothing to scoff at. Even if that drops 10 mpg by the time it goes on the EPA circuit, it's a good number.

    • Dmulyadi Dmulyadi on Jul 24, 2021

      Since bigger car like RAV4 hybrid can reach 40mpg then the smaller car must be able to reach more than 60 mpg. If it can get 70+mpg it should sell well for a commuter car remember many ppl still avoiding subway and buses in many metro cities. Small enough to fit folks in HOV lanes and easy to park in tight spots plus with higher till prices nowadays saving fuel here there could help save for retirement.

  • Arthur Dailey An uncle of mine purchases a 2nd generation Accord sedan. At the time, at least in Canada the hatchback Accord was seen more often than the sedan. After driving it, I became a huge fan. At the time my wife and I were both driving Civics. When I could afford to, we purchased a brand new 1986 (3rd generation) Accord sedan. That is still my wife's all time favourite vehicle of the many that we have had.The only issue we ever had was with the A/C which despite our ordering the car, was a dealer installed option, as was the norm with Hondas in Canada at that time. I eventually sold it to a co-worker. Who then sold it to one of his family members. 15 years later it was still 'going strong'. My uncle came into some money and replaced his Accord with a brand new Jaguar sedan. He had a love/hate relationship with the Jaguar. Loved it when it ran properly. Hated it ever time there was an issue, or he had to pay for maintenance/repairs/parts for it.
  • Buickman some stores may have still had some carbon paper on hand?
  • Zerofoo I would rather that car companies put the correct engine in the car to start. The "base" engine is almost always there for rental car fodder. Simplifying drivetrains would go a long way to reducing costs. If you want a smaller engine, buy a smaller car. The trend of putting small highly-stressed engines in big cars sucks. Hybrid drivetrains are even worse - complex, heavy, and certain to cause future high repair bills. All for a few MPG. Finally, to hell with CAFE standards. Just divide the fines among all the units you sell and get some lobbyists to get rid of the standards the Federal Government has no constitutional right to set anyway.
  • Master Baiter But, is the EX30 as glitchy as Joe Biden on a debate stage?
  • Master Baiter We're a long way from the days when, if you had compression, fuel and spark, the car would get you from point A to point B. Now, cue the Captain Obvious NPCs who are going to tell me, "modern cars are much more reliable...blah blah blah..."
Next