QOTD: Is Congestion Pricing a Good Idea?

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

New York City has put off its congestion-pricing plan indefinitely.


Though I live halfway across the country, I am glad that the governor of New York has put the kibosh on this, at least for the moment. While I am all for reducing traffic and congestion and the environmental damage it does, as well as improving pedestrian safety and encouraging the use of public transportation, I don't think congestion pricing is the right approach.

I don't love the idea of taxing commuters who have no choice but to drive -- public transit doesn't work for everyone, and that's true even with NYC's generally comprehensive subway system. I also can foresee a scenario in which delivery companies pass prices onto businesses and consumers. New York City is expensive enough -- imagine paying even more for dinner because it costs restaurants more to have food delivered?

It also appears that cabs and Ubers wouldn't have been exempt from the scheme. There's no doubt rideshare companies and cab companies would've passed that cost onto riders -- and taxi prices have already gotten expensive. I was shocked how much more a cab from LaGuardia to Midtown was when I was in town for the New York Auto Show, compared to just a few years ago.

Not to mention the potential privacy issues that crop up when it comes to the technology needed to make congestion pricing work.

On the other hand, congestion is a huge problem not just in NYC but in most cities in this country. I experience it regularly here in Chicago. If we can get more people onto public transit or into rideshares, we can unclog our roads and reduce pollution.

Maybe I am wrong, though -- maybe congestion pricing would deter people from driving into congested city centers without a good reason. Or maybe I am right, and there are other, better solutions to our traffic woes.

What say you? Sound off below.

[Image: Fahroni/Shutterstock.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 98 comments
  • Tstew78 Aren't they a ZZ Top cover band?
  • JMII A few weeks ago we looked at Genesis GV60 (wife loved it) and without any prompting the sales guy said he could take $17k off. A few minutes earlier when I inquired about colors and availability (just as test since I already knew the answer) he claimed they didn't have many because they are selling so quickly. Well if that's true then why the discount? turns out they can't give these things away. I fully expect 50% off in 2 years when the leases get returned. I'll happy take a lightly used 70k luxury EV when its only 35k.
  • SCE to AUX Once the distortions of the uneven new/used subsidies are considered, it's hard to say what's really going on.But lower prices are probably going to be reflected in greater losses for the EV operations of these mfrs. H/K/G may be profitable already (?), and Rivian claims they will be by the end of 2024, but the other non-Tesla operations are all under water.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Wowzers!
  • SCE to AUX It's a trainwreck, Norfolk Southern style.
Next